- CODEN : IAJPBB
- issn 2349-7750
TITLE:
AUTHENTIC AND OBVIOUS PERVASIVENESS OF MALARIA INFECTION AND THE INVOLVEMENT OF BAYESIAN TECHNIQUES
AUTHORS:
Dr Fouad Mahmood Khan, Dr Muhammad Mashkat Junaid, Dr Fazal Kareim
ABSTRACT:
Aim: The aim and objective in light of our research and study is to introduce another methodology for assessing the ''genuine pervasiveness'' of intestinal sickness and apply it to data sets from Pakistan. Methods: Our current research was conducted at Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, Lahore from December 2018 to November 2019. This methodology, which provides an ideal and orchestrated measure of the extent of jungle fever contamination without conflict between extraordinary data sources, has been tested on information from Peru, Vietnam and Cambodia. Bayesian models have been created to evaluate both the banality of jungle fever using various analytical tests (microscopy, PCR and ELISA), without the need to achieve a high level of quality, and the attributes of the tests. Some data sources, e.g. information, main findings and different sources of information can be incorporated into the model. Results: Affectability of microscopy and ELISA was significantly lower in Vietnam than in other countries. Malaria seroperme ability was generally low in all regions, with ELISA indicating the highest assessments. The specificities of microscopy, ELISA, and PCR were fundamentally lower in Vietnam than in other countries. In Vietnam and Peru, microscopy was closer to the "valid" gauge than the other two tests, while the ELISA form, with its weaker specificity, generally overestimated the commonality. Conclusion: This restriction can be circumvented by the use of a Bayesian system by taking into account the defective attributes of currently available indicative tests. As mentioned in the paper, this methodology could strengthen global activities for the assessment of jungle fever disorders. Bayesian techniques are useful for examining common results when no test indicative of the highest level of quality is available. While some results are normal, for example PCR that is more sensitive than microscopy, a standardized and context-independent assessment of the attributes of the indicative tests (affectability and particularity) and the prevalence of baseline bowel disease may be useful to examine changes in localization. In fact, the use of a solitary analytical procedure may strongly predispose to the assessment of predominance. Keywords: Prevalence, Malaria Infection, Actual and Apparent
FULL TEXT
<Approved Journal
NLM ID:101711216 [Serial]
Included in EuroPub database
ICV 2015 - 61.16
Indexed In
S.J Impact Factor:7.157
cosmos Impact Factor:4.153
ICMJE Recommendations
IP Indexing Impact Factor: 2.76
Cover Page
