Dr. Afifah Zamir, Dr. Fizza Agha, Dr. Saira Khalid
Objective: To contrast, the worldwide catalogue gets by Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm (SITA), a typical plan by these get by a SITA-Fast plan by Humphrey chart field Analyzer, in patients of glaucoma. Methodology: A cross-sectional research was conducted at Services Hospital, Lahore from February to November 2017. SITA typical or SITA quick illustration field psychoanalysis of one hundred eighty-four patients was approved exposed on Humphrey Visual Field Analyzer (HFA-II) by colourless on colourless border with 30 – 2 agenda on successive patients that vigorous the insertion standard. The rate of prototype typical divergence denotes divergence or time in use to total the assessment were renowned. A p-value of <0.06 remained careful important. Result: Average Deviation remained designed through HFA-II, practising SITA Normal algorithm remained (-15.04 ± 7.32) dB, Average Deviation designed through SITA Fast algorithm stayed (-14.9 ± 7.3) dB, having not any substantial alteration among 2, p>0.06. Average PSD by way of intended b HFA-II, practising SITA Average procedure stayed (8.8 ± 5.5 dB), PSD practising SITA Fast procedure remained (8.6 ± 5.3) dB, having not any substantial variance among those, p≥0.06. This acquired (7.35 ± 3.2) minutes to comprehend inspection by Fast approach in addition (10.4 ± 3.7) minutes by Normal Policy. Outcomes remained substantial. Conclusion: SITA quick policies take considerably fewer times to whole an assessment with the similar consistency as SITA normal approach. Keyword: SITA Quick, SITA Typical, Glaucoma.