- CODEN : IAJPBB
- issn 2349-7750
TITLE:
PROSPECTIVE ANALYTICAL COMPARISON IN SONOGRAPHIC MEASUREMENTS ON ABW WITH STUDY TO FWA
AUTHORS:
Dr Hafiza Aqsa Faiz, Dr. Maryam Khan, Dr Ayesha Iftikhar
ABSTRACT:
Aim: To determine the accurateness of fetal weight that has been derived from the six modules of sonographic cases, to estimate the birth of actual of the babies or neonates in Pakistan. The purpose of the study is to determine either results taken from the sonographic technique are similar to the actual weight of the babies after delivery. Technique: The cross-divitional analytical study was conducted by using the data of 245 women which were having singleton pregnancies at Multan hospital, Pakistan from September 2017 to February 2020. To determine Estimated Fetal Weight, the fetal parameters were obtained by obstetric ultrasound scan from which each woman who has participated was included into sonographic modules. Scan Delivery Interval as well as Actual Birth Weight were obtained from the birth. Percentage error, sensitivity test, ROC curve analysis, and proportion of EFW with ABW were used to determine the accuracy of sonographic modules. Results: The Hadlock Biparietal Diameter per Abdominal Circumference per Femur Length as well as Hadlock BPD/AC modules have the slightest systematic error (-0.5% and -0.7%) as compared to other modules, and advanced proportions of precise estimated fetal weight in 10% of actual birth weights. For new-born in the normal weight class, Hadlock BPD/AC module best found the ABW (p=0.006, ROC curve area=0.737). Conclusion: The Hadlock BPD/AC method constantly determined elevated correctness for assessment of fetal weight. It is analogous with Hadlock BPD/AC/FL module but it has a benefit of finding less fetal parameters Keywords: Estimated Fetal Weight, coronavirus, sonographic modules, ROC curve analysis, Actual Birth Weight
FULL TEXT
Approved Journal
NLM ID:101711216 [Serial]
Included in EuroPub database
ICV 2015 - 61.16
Indexed In
S.J Impact Factor:7.157
cosmos Impact Factor:4.153
ICMJE Recommendations
IP Indexing Impact Factor: 2.76
Cover Page
