Volume : 08, Issue : 11, November – 2021

Title:

18.THE PREFERENCES AND PRACTICES OF OPHTHALMOLOGISTS REGARDING REFRACTIVE SURGERIES IN MIDDLE EAST COUNTRIES

Authors :

Abdullhamid AL- Ghamdi , Rahma A.Algethami , Yousef Alharbi , Nada Almalki , lama Aljohani , Abdulrahman Al-Amri , Ma’an Al-Barry

Abstract :

Background and Objectives: Refractive errors are the leading cause of impairments visual impairments in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Laser refractive eye surgeries are getting huge popularity for correcting these visual impairments in KSA and other gulf countries. The study assessed the preferences and practices of ophthalmologists regarding refractive surgeries in Middle East countries.
Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted using an online questionnaire among the Saudi Ophthalmology Society (SOS) members. The questionnaire was pilot tested and had 28 items that included sociodemographic details and practices related to refractive eye surgery of participating ophthalmologists. The data collected were subjected to statistical analysis, and Pearson’s chi-square test was used to find the relationship between categorical variables.
Results: Excimer laser platform EX 500 (Alcon) was the most commonly used Refractive surgery system. There were region-wide differences observed in the type of Refractive surgery system where surgeons from central KSA used AMARIS 1050 RS (SCHWIND) (83.4%) and AMARIS 500 (SCHWIND) (68.4%) comparatively more than other regions (p<0.05). The majority of the eye surgeons (84.4%) used Pentacam Comprehensive Eye Scanner preoperative screening, and Corneal Topography was the most commonly used preoperative examination method. Only 9.1% of the surgeons had refractive eye surgery on 75-100% of their patients, and the most commonly preferred RES by the surgeons in our study was Photorefractive Keratectomy [PRK].
Conclusion: The findings showed that refractive eye surgery trends are changing, and surgeons are shifting to more reliable techniques with fewer post-surgical complications.
Keywords: Refractive errors, Refractive surgeries, Ophthalmologists, Saudi Arabia

Cite This Article:

Please cite this article in press Rahma A.Algethami et al, The Preferences And Practices Of Ophthalmologists Regarding Refractive Surgeries In Middle East Countries, Indo Am. J. P. Sci, 2021; 08(11).

Number of Downloads : 10

References:

1. Naidoo KS, Leasher J, Bourne RR, Flaxman SR, Jonas JB, Keeffe J, Limburg H, Pesudovs K, Price H, White RA, Wong TY, Taylor HR, Resnikoff S; Vision Loss Expert Group of the Global Burden of Disease Study. Global Vision Impairment and Blindness Due to Uncorrected Refractive Error, 1990-2010. Optom Vis Sci. 2016 Mar;93(3):227-34.
2. McGhee CN, Ormonde S, Kohnen T, Lawless M, Brahma A, Comaish I. The surgical correction of moderate hypermetropia: the management controversy. Br J Ophthalmol. 2002;86(7):815-822.
3. Brahma A, McGhee CN. Surgical correction of refractive errors (Review). J Roy Soc Med2000;93:118–23.
4. Kohnen T. Advances in the surgical correction of hyperopia (editorial). J Cataract Refract Surg1998;24:1–2.
5. Parrey MUR, Elmorsy E. Prevalence and pattern of refractive errors among Saudi adults. Pak J Med Sci. 2019;35(2):394-398. doi:10.12669/pjms.35.2.648
6. Al-Shaaln FF, Bakrman MA, Ibrahim AM, Aljoudi AS. Prevalence and causes of visual impairment among Saudi adults attending primary health care centers in northern Saudi Arabia. Ann Saudi Med. 2011;31(5):473–480.
7. Parrey MU, Alswelmi FK. Prevalence and causes of visual impairment among Saudi adults. Pak J Med Sci. 2017;33(1):167–171.
8. Tabbara KF, El-Sheikh HF, Shawaf SS. Pattern of childhood blindness at a referral center in Saudi Arabia. Ann Saudi Med. 2005;25(1):18–21
9. Tanna AP. Growing Evidence of the Importance of the Macula in Glaucoma. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2017 Jul 1;135(7):747-748.
10. Schmack I, Auffarth GU, Epstein D, Holzer MP. Refractive surgery trends and practice style changes in Germany over a 3-year period. J Refract Surg. 2010 Mar;26(3):202-8.
11. Sugar A, Rapuano CJ, Culbertson WW, et al. Laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia and astigmatism: safety and efficacy: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmol 2002; 109: 175–87.
12. Melki SA, Azar DT. LASIK complications: etiology, management, and prevention. Surv Ophthalmol. 2001 Sep-Oct;46(2):95-116.
13. Camellin M. Laser epithelial keratomileusis for myopia. J Refract Surg 2003;19:666-70.
14. Ahn JH, Kim DH, Shyn KH. Investigation of the Changes in Refractive Surgery Trends in Korea. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2018;32(1):8-15.
15. Kuo IC. Trends in refractive surgery at an academic center: 2007-2009. BMC Ophthalmol. 2011;11:11.
16. Kim TI, Alió Del Barrio JL, Wilkins M, Cochener B, Ang M. Refractive surgery. Lancet. 2019 May 18;393(10185):2085-2098.
17. Sandoval HP, Donnenfeld ED, Kohnen T, et al. Modern laser in situ keratomileusis outcomes. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016;42(8):1224–1234.
18. Pasquali TA, Smadja D, Savetsky MJ, Reggiani Mello GH, Alkhawaldeh F, Krueger RR. Long-term follow-up after laser vision correction in physicians: quality of life and patient satisfaction. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014;40(3):395–402.
19. Reyna VF. A theory of medical decision making and health: fuzzy trace theory. Med Decis Making. 2008;28(6):850–865
20. Alsabaani N, Alshehri MS, AlFlan MA, Awadalla NJ. Prevalence of laser refractive surgery among ophthalmologists in Saudi Arabia. Saudi J Ophthalmol. 2020;34(2):116-119. Published 2020 Dec 28. doi:10.4103/1319-4534.305043
21. Ambrósio R Jr, Wilson S. LASIK vs LASEK vs PRK: advantages and indications. Semin Ophthalmol. 2003 Mar;18(1):2-10. doi: 10.1076/soph.18.1.2.14074.
22. Ku M, Shyn KH. 2006 Survey for KSCRS members: current trends in refractive surgery in Korea. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc 2009;50:182-8.
23. Huang D, Schallhorn SC, Sugar A, et al. Phakic intraocular lens implantation for the correction of myopia: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology.2009;116(11):2244-58. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.08.018
24. El Bahrawy M, Alio JL. Excimer laser 6(th) generation: state of the art and refractive surgical outcomes. Eye Vis (Lond) 2015;2:6. doi: 10.1186/s40662-015-0015-5.
25. Arbelaez MC, Aslanides IM, Barraquer C, et al. LASIK for myopia and astigmatism using the SCHWIND AMARIS excimer laser: an international multicenter trial. J Refract Surg. 2010;26(2):8898. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20100121-04.
26. Motlagh MN, Moshirfar M, Murri MS, et al. Pentacam® Corneal Tomography for Screening of Refractive Surgery Candidates: A Review of the Literature, Part I. Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol. 2019;8(3):177-203.
27. Uçakhan OO, Ozkan M, Kanpolat A. Corneal thickness measurements in normal and keratoconic eyes: Pentacam comprehensive eye scanner versus noncontact specular microscopy and ultrasound pachymetry. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006;32(6):970-7. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2006.02.037
28. Heidari Z, Mohammadpour M, Hashemi H, et al. Early diagnosis of subclinical keratoconus by wavefront parameters using Scheimpflug, Placido and Hartmann-Shack based devices. Int Ophthalmol. 2020;40(7):1659-71. doi:10.1007/s10792-020-01334-3
29. Fan R, Chan TC, Prakash G, Jhanji V. Applications of corneal topography and tomography: a review. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018;46(2):133-46. doi:10.1111/ceo.13136
30. Belovay GW, Goldberg I. The thick and thin of the central corneal thickness in glaucoma. Eye (Lond). 2018;32(5):915-23. doi:10.1038/s41433-018-0033-3
31. Nagy ZZ, McAlinden C. Femtosecond laser cataract surgery. Eye Vis (Lond). 2015;2:11. doi:10.1186/s40662-015-0021-7
32. Kim CY, Song JH, Na KS, Chung SH, Joo CK. Factors influencing corneal flap thickness in laser in situ keratomileusis with a femtosecond laser. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2011;25(1):8-14. doi:10.3341/kjo.2011.25.1.8
33. Tai YC, Sun CC. Effects of flap diameter on dry eye parameters and corneal sensation after femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK. Taiwan J Ophthalmol. 2019;9(3):166-72. doi:10.4103/tjo.tjo_59_19.
34. Duffey RJ, Leaming D. US trends in refractive surgery: 2015 ISRS survey [Internet]. Las Vegas: American Academy of Ophthalmology; 2015 [cited 2017 Nov 30]. Available from: http://isrs.aao.org/Assets/61d6958b-696a-4888-b539- 757156c28663/635839820892400000
35. Lundström M, Dickman M, Henry Y, et al. Risk factors for refractive error after cataract surgery: Analysis of 282 811 cataract extractions reported to the European Registry of Quality Outcomes for cataract and refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2018;44(4):447-52. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.01.031.
36. Zvorničanin J, Zvorničanin E. Premium intraocular lenses: The past, present and future. J Curr Ophthalmol. 2018;30(4):287-96. doi:10.1016/j.joco.2018.04.003.