Volume : 11, Issue : 12, December – 2024
Title:
EVALUATING THE IMPACT OF THE LUCAS CPR DEVICE IN PREHOSPITAL CARE: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS
Authors :
Abdulelah Hejji Musayikh Alanazi, Emad Fadhel Ahmed Alanazi, Nasser Mohammed Jaddua Alanazi, Derea Saud Alotaibi, Ayed Obaid S. Alenazi, Hamoud Mohsen Al subaie
Abstract :
The LUCAS CPR device has emerged as a groundbreaking tool in prehospital care, designed to deliver consistent and high-quality chest compressions during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). This article critically evaluates the device’s impact on patient outcomes, operational efficiency, and prehospital emergency services. By synthesizing findings from clinical trials, observational studies, and real-world applications, the analysis highlights the advantages of the LUCAS device in improving survival rates, reducing fatigue among emergency medical personnel, and enhancing workflow in challenging environments. However, the study also addresses limitations, such as cost, device-related complications, and varying efficacy across patient profiles. Recommendations for future research and integration strategies are provided to maximize its potential in prehospital care.
Keywords: LUCAS CPR device, prehospital care, mechanical CPR, cardiac arrest, emergency medical services, patient outcomes, operational efficiency, healthcare innovation.
Cite This Article:
Please cite this article in press Abdulelah Hejji Musayikh Alanazi et al., Evaluating The Impact Of The Lucas CPR Device In Prehospital Care: A Critical Analysis..,Indo Am. J. P. Sci, 2024; 11 (12).
Number of Downloads : 10
References:
1. Andersen, L. W., et al. (2016). Mechanical CPR versus manual CPR for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. New England Journal of Medicine, 374(20), 1948-1950. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1509134
2. Beesems, S. G., et al. (2021). Mechanical versus manual chest compressions in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A meta-analysis. Resuscitation, 164, 1-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.01.012
3. Clinical Evidence – LUCAS Chest Compression System. Retrieved from lucas-cpr.com.
4. Clinical Summary – LUCAS in Cardiac Arrest. Retrieved from lucas-cpr.com.
5. Gräsner, J. T., et al. (2021). Cost-effectiveness of mechanical CPR devices: Insights from recent studies. Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, 29(1), 34. DOI: 10.1186/s13049-021-00866-z
6. Hüpfl, M., et al. (2017). Rib fractures associated with mechanical CPR devices: A clinical study. Resuscitation, 118, 81-86. DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2016.12.001
7. Liao, Q. (2011). LUCAS – Lund University Cardiopulmonary Assist System. Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Clinical Sciences, Lund University.
8. Mechanical Versus Manual Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Retrieved from ccforum.biomedcentral.com.
9. Perkins, G. D., et al. (2020). Adult basic and advanced life support: 2020 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations. Circulation, 142(16_suppl_1), S41–S91. DOI: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000911
10. Quality of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest. Retrieved from sjtrem.biomedcentral.com.
11. Rehatschek, G., et al. (2016). Mechanical LUCAS Resuscitation is Effective, Reduces Physical Workload and Improves Mental Performance of Helicopter Teams. Minerva Anestesiologica, 82(4), 429-437.
12. Soar, J., et al. (2020). Ethical considerations in the use of mechanical CPR devices: Balancing outcomes and resources. Resuscitation, 151, 67-71. DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.06.003
13. The Efficacy of LUCAS in Prehospital Cardiac Arrest Scenarios: A Crossover Mannequin Study. Retrieved from pure.psu.edu.
14. Wik, L., et al. (2019). Efficiency of mechanical chest compression devices compared to manual compressions: A review. Clinical Research in Cardiology, 108(11), 1237-1246. DOI: 10.1007/s00392-019-01534-z
15. Wikipedia. (n.d.). Cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Retrieved from en.wikipedia.org.
16. Wikipedia. (n.d.). LUCAS device. Retrieved from en.wikipedia.org.