Volume : 08, Issue : 05, May – 2021
Title:
42.CORRELATION BETWEEN BITING FORCE AND MUSCLE ACTIVITY ACCORDING TO IMPLANT POSITION IN LOWER CLASS I KENNEDY PARTIAL DENTURE
Authors :
Faisal hamad Alotaibi and Omar Seraj Halawani
Abstract :
Purpose: The placement of dental implants in a distal RPD extension provided more stable and reliable occlusion. The target of this trial was to investigate the degree of correlation between the maximum biting force and surface electromyography of masseter fibers and anterior fibers of temporalis in two different implant positions in lower Kennedy class I
Material and methods: Fourteen patients having lower Kennedy class I with the first premolar as the last abutment and completely dentulous maxilla were randomly divided into two equal groups to receive implant supported partial overdenture. Each group received posterior bilateral two implants in the second molar area in the first group, while the group 2 one in the second premolar area. Right and left Maximum biting force was measured for both groups using I loadstar sensor and masseter and anterior temporalis muscle activity were evaluated with Surface Electromyography
Result: The data revealed that group I had significant positive correlation between maximum biting force and the masseter and anterior temporalis muscles activity in both the right and the left side with r value (1 , 0.79 , 0.89 and 0.75) respectively on the other hand the group II showed no significant positive correlation with r(0.04,0.01.-0.04 and -0.11) respectively
Conclusion: Within the limitation of this clinical trial, it was concluded that there were better muscle coordination between the two largest muscles of mastication (masseter and temporalis) and the produced biting force as a product due to installation of posterior implant in the lower second molar area.
Key Word: Lower Kennedy class I, Implant supported partial overdenture, biting force, muscles activity.
Cite This Article:
Please cite this article in press Faisal hamad Alotaibi et al., Correlation Between Biting Force And Muscle Activity According To Implant Position In Lower Class I Kennedy Partial Denture.,Indo Am. J. P. Sci, 2021; 08 (05).
Number of Downloads : 10
References:
1- Itoh, H., Caputo, A.A., Wylie, R.: Effects of periodon- tal support and fixed splinting on load transfer by remov- able partial dentures. J. Prosthet. Dent. .1998. 79:465-471
2- Lammie GA, Laird WRE. Osborne & Lammie’s partial dentures. 5th ed. Oxford: Blackwell, 1986:295-6.
3- Rocha, E.P., Luersen, M.A., Pellizzer, and E.P.: Distal- extension removable partial denture associated with an os- seointegrated implant. Study by the finite element method.
J. Dent. Res. 2003, 82: B-254
4- Verri, F.R., Pellizzer, E.P., Rocha, E.P. & Pereira, J.A.: Influence of Length and Diameter of Implants Asso- ciated With Distal Extension Removable Partial Dentures; Imp Dent 16: 2007 275-280.
5- Keltjens HM, Kayser AF, Hertel R, Battistuzzi PG.: Dis- tal extension removable partial dentures supported by im- plants and residual teeth: considerations and case reports. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1993;8:208–213
6- Brudvik JS. Advanced removable partial dentures. Chi- cago: Quintessence, 1999.
7- Van der Bilt, A., Tekamp, A., Van der Glas, H. and Ab- bink, J. Bite force and electromyography during maximum unilateral and bilateral clenching. European Journal of Oral Sciences.2008 116, 217-222
8- Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Zanotti G, Tartagilia GM. Maximal bite force in healthy young adults as predicted by surface electromyography. J Dent. 2004; 32:451–457.
9- Castroflorio T, Bracco P, Farina D. Surface electromyog- raphy in the assessment of jaw elevator muscles. J Oral Rehabil. 2008; 35:638–645.
10- Haraldson T, Jemt T, Stalblad P, Lekholm U. Oral function in subjects with overdentures supported by osseointegrated implants. Scand J Dent Res. 1988; 96:235–242.
11- Fontijn-Tekamp FA, Slagter AP, van’t Hof MA, Geertman ME, Kalk W. Bite forces with mandibular implant-retained overdentures. J Dent Res. 1998; 77:1832–1839.
12- Van Kampen FMC, van der Bilt A, Cune MS, Bosman F.: The influence of various attachment types in mandibular implant-retained overdentures on maximum bite force and EMG. J Dent Res. 2002; 81:170–173.
13- Gea Drost, Dick F. Stegeman, Baziel G.M. van Engelen, Machiel J. Zwarts.: Clinical applications of high density surface EMG: A systematic review. Journal of Electromy- ography and Kinesiology. 2006; 16:586–602.
14- Geckili O, Bilhan H, Mumcu E, Tuncer N: The Influ- ence of Maximum Bite Force on Patient Satisfaction and Quality of Life of Patients Wearing Mandibular Implant Overdentures, Journal of Oral Implantology2012,271-277: XXXVIII (3)
15- Hatch JP, Shinkai RS, Sakai S, Rugh JD, Paunovich ED. Determinants of masticatory performance in dentate adults. Arch Oral Biol. 2001;46:641–648
16- Fontijn-Tekamp FA, Slagter AP, Van Der Bilt A: Biting and chewing in overdentures, full dentures, and natural dentitions.J Dent Res. 2000; 79: 1519–1524.
17- Lassila V, Holmlund I, Koivumaa KK.: Bite force and its correlations in different denture types. Acta Odontol Scand.1985; 43:127–132.
18- Van Waas MA, Jonkman RE, Kalk W, Van ’t Hof MA, Plooij J, Van Os JH. Differences two years after tooth extraction in mandibular bone reduction in patients treated with immediate overdentures or with immediate complete dentures. J Dent Res.1993;72: 1001–1004.
19- Bakke M, Holm B, Gotfredsen K. Masticatory function and patient satisfaction with implant-supported mandibu- lar overdentures:a prospective 5-year study. Int J Prostho- dont. 2002; 15: 575–581.
20- Van Rensburg BGJ. Oral Biology. 1st ed. Berlin: Quintes- sence Publishing; 1995.
21- Memari Y, Geramy A, Fayaz A, Rezvani Habib Abadi S, Mansouri Y. Influence of implant position on stress distri- bution in implant-assisted distal extension removable par- tial dentures: A 3D finite element analysis. J Dent (Tehran). 2014; 11(5):523-530.
22- Matsudate Y, Yoda N, Nanba M, Ogawa T, Sasaki K. Load distribution on abutment tooth, implant and residual ridge with distal-extension implant-supported removable partial denture. J Prosthodont Res. 2016. Epublication ahead of print.
23- Oh WS, Oh TJ, Park JM. Impact of implant-support on mandibular free-end base removable partial denture: Theo- retical study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016;27(2):e87-90.
24- Kiliaridis S, Kjellberg H, Wenneberg B, Engström C The relationship between maximal bite force, bite force endurance, and facial morphology during growth. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica. 1993 51: 323–331
25- Santana-Mora U, López-Cedrún J, Mora MJ, Otero XL, Santana- Penín U. Temporomandibular disorders: the habit- ual chewing side syndrome. PLoS One. 2013;8(4):e59980.
26- Ferrario VF, Sforza C., Serrao G., Dellavia C., Tartagilia GM. : Single tooth bite forces in healthy young adults .j. oral Rehabil.2004:31,18-22
27- Tortopidis D, Lyons MF, Baxendle RH, Gilmour WH. The variability of bite force measurements between sessions, in different positions within the dental arch. J. Oral rehabil. 1998:25:,681-686
28- Braun S, Freudenthaler JW, Honigle K.A study of maxi- mum bite force during growth and development.Angle Or- thod.1996:66;261-264
29- Grossmann Y, Nissan J, Levin L. Clinical effectiveness of implant-supported removable partial dentures: A review of the literature and retrospective case evaluation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;67(9):1941-1946.