Volume : 13, Issue : 11, November – 2026
Title:
FORMULATION AND EVALUATION OF DELAYED DRUG RELEASE OF DALFAMPRIDINE
Authors :
Kadavergu Shreya, I.Nagaraju, Dr. K. Ramesh, G. Vijaya Kumar
Abstract :
The present study aimed to develop and evaluate a delayed drug release formulation of Dalfampridine to achieve controlled and prolonged drug release. A total of eight formulations (D1–D8) were prepared using different polymers and polymer ratios. Formulations D1 to D4 were prepared using Eudragit S100 as the polymer, while D5 to D8 were formulated using Hydroxypropyl Methylcellulose (HPMC) in varying concentrations to study their effect on the drug release profile.
All the prepared formulations were evaluated for pre-compression parameters such as bulk density, tapped density, Carr’s index, Hausner’s ratio, and angle of repose to assess the flow properties of the powder blend. The compressed tablets were further evaluated for post-compression parameters including hardness, friability, weight variation, thickness, and drug content. The results indicated that all formulations complied with the Indian Pharmacopoeia (IP) limits, indicating good tablet quality and uniformity.
In-vitro dissolution studies were carried out to determine the drug release behaviour of the formulations. Among all the formulations, D4, containing Eudragit S100 in an optimized ratio, showed the best drug release profile with 99.68% drug release over 12 hours. Therefore, D4 was considered as the optimized formulation due to its satisfactory physicochemical properties and controlled drug release characteristics.
The study concludes that the formulated delayed release tablets of Dalfampridine using Eudragit S100 can effectively provide prolonged drug release and may enhance therapeutic efficacy and patient compliance.
Keywords: Dalfampridine, Eudragit S100, Hydroxypropyl Methylcellulose (HPMC).
Cite This Article:
Please cite this article in press Kadavergu Shreya et al., Formulation And Evaluation Of Delayed Drug Release Of Dalfampridine.,. Indo Am. J. P. Sci, 2026; 13(11).
REFERENCES:
1. Nokhodchi, Shaista Raja, Priya Patel, Kofi Asare-Addo. The Role Of Oral Controlled Release Matrix Tablets In Drug Delivery Systems. Bio impacts. 2(4);175-187:2012.
2. Ronald A Siegel, Michael J Rathbone. Departments Of Pharmaceutics And Biomedical Engineering: Chapter 2: Overview Of Controlled release mechanisms. Minneapolis. 2012:19-43.
3. Patel Kundan K, Patel Mehul S, Bhatt Nayana M, Patel Laxman Bhai D, Pathak Nimish Land Patel Kanu J. An Overview: Extended-Release Matrix Technology. Vol. 1 (2) Apr – Jun 2012.
4. Wani MS et al. Controlled Release System-A Review. Pharmaceutical Reviews. 2008; 6 (1): 41-46.
5. Hayashi T et al. Formulation, study and drug release mechanism of a new Theophylline sustained-release preparation. Int. J Pharm. 2005; 304: 91-101.
6. Nokhodchi, Shokri J and Gnafourian T. Prediction of solubility of benzodiazepines using different cosolvency model. Int. J. Pharmacol. 2002; 57: 555-557.
7. Venkatraman S, Davar N and Chester A. An overview of controlled release systems: Edited by Donald L Wise, New York, Marcel Dekker Inc. Handbook of Pharmaceutical controlled release Technology, 2000; 431- 465.
8. Jantzen GM and Robinson JR, Sustained and controlled release drug delivery systems, in Banker GS, Rhodes CT (Eds.) Modern Pharmaceutics, Third Edition, Revised and Expanded, Drugs and The Pharmaceutical Sciences, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, 1995; 72: 575-609.
9. Brahmankar HA and Jaiswal SB, Biopharmaceutics and Pharmacokinetics A Treatise, Vallabh Prakashan, 2000; 337, 348-357.
10. Cole T, Follonier M and Doelkar E. Evaluation of hot melt extrusion as a new technique for the production of polymer-based pellets for sustained release capsules containing high loading of freely soluble drug. Drugs develop Ind Pharm. 1994; 20 (8):1323-1339.
11. Chien-Chi L and Metters A T. Hydrogels for controlled release formulation- Network design and mathematical modeling. Advanced drug delivery reviews. 2006; 58: 1379-1408.
12. Sriwongjanya M and Bodmeier R. Entrapment of drug loaded ion exchange particles within polymeric microparticles. Int. J. Pharm. 1988; 48: 217-222.
13. Cox PJ, Khan KA and Munday DL, Development and evaluation of a multiple-unit oral sustained release dosage form for S (+)-ibuprofen: preparation and release kinetics. Int. J. Pharm. 1999; 193: 73-84.
14. Loftipour et al. Effect of anionic polymers on the release of Propranolol Hydrochloride from matrix tablets. J. Pharm. Sci. 2004; 84: 991-997.
15. Genc. Studies on controlled release Dimenhydrinate from matrix tablet formulation. Pharm Acta Helv. 1999; 74: 43-49.
16. Nokhodchi A and Farid J. The effects of various factors on the release rate of a poorly soluble drug (Carbamazepine) from hydroxypropyl methylcellulose matrices. STP Pharmcol. Sci. 2000; 10(6): 473-478.
17. Zhou F, Vervaet C, Schelkens M, Lefebvre R and Remon JP. Bioavailability of ibuprofen from matrix pellets based on the combination of waxes and starch derivatives. Int. J. Pharm. 1998; 168(1): 79-84.
18. Vergote GJ et al. An oral controlled release matrix pellet formulation containing nanocrystalline Ketoprofen. Int. J. Pharm. 2001; 219(1-2): 81- 87.
19. Hayashi T et al. Formulation study and drug release mechanism of a new Theophylline sustained release preparation. Int. J. Pharm. 2005; 304: 91-101.
20. Yuksel M, Okajima K, Uchiba M, Okabe H. Gabexate mesilate, a synthetic protease inhibitor. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Thera. 2003; 395: 298-305.




