Volume : 08, Issue : 04, April – 2021

Title:

46.CORRELATION BETWEEN BITING FORCE AND MUSCLE ACTIVITY ACCORDING TO IMPLANT POSITION IN LOWER CLASS I KENNEDY PARTIAL DENTURE

Authors :

Faisal H Alzaidi’ Omar S Halawani

Abstract :

Purpose: The placement of dental implants in a distal RPD extension provided more stable and reliable occlusion. The target of this trial was to investigate the degree of correlation between the maximum biting force and surface electromyography of masseter fibers and anterior fibers of temporalis in two different implant positions in lower Kennedy class I
Material and methods: Fourteen patients having lower Kennedy class I with the first premolar as the last abutment and completely dentulous maxilla were randomly divided into two equal groups to receive implant supported partial overdenture. Each group received posterior bilateral two implants in the second molar area in the first group, while the group 2 one in the second premolar area. Right and left Maximum biting force was measured for both groups using I loadstar sensor and masseter and anterior temporalis muscle activity were evaluated with Surface Electromyography
Result: The data revealed that group I had significant positive correlation between maximum biting force and the masseter and anterior temporalis muscles activity in both the right and the left side with r value (1 , 0.79 , 0.89 and 0.75) respectively on the other hand the group II showed no significant positive correlation with r(0.04,0.01.-0.04 and -0.11) respectively
Conclusion: Within the limitation of this clinical trial, it was concluded that there were better muscle coordination between the two largest muscles of mastication (masseter and temporalis) and the produced biting force as a product due to installation of posterior implant in the lower second molar area.
Key Word: Lower Kennedy class I, Implant supported partial overdenture, biting force, muscles activity

Cite This Article:

Please cite this article in Faisal H Alzaidi’ Omar S Halawani , Correlation Between Biting Force And Muscle Activity According To Implant Position In Lower Class I Kennedy Partial Denture., Indo Am. J. P. Sci, 2021; 08(04).

Number of Downloads : 10

References:

1. Itoh, H., Caputo, A.A., Wylie, R.: Effects of periodon- tal support and fixed splinting on load transfer by remov- able partial dentures. J. Prosthet. Dent. .1998. 79:465-471
2. Lammie CPA, Laird WRE. Osborne & Lammie’s partial dentures. 5th ed. Oxford: Blackwell, 1986:295-6.
3. Rocha, E.P., Luersen, M.A., Pellizzer, and E.P.: Distal- extension removable partial denture associated with an os- seointegrated implant. Study by the finite element method. J. Dent. Res. 2003, 82: B-254
4. Verri, F.R., Pellizzer, E.P., Rocha, E.P. & Pereira, J.A.: Influence of Length and Diameter of Implants Asso- ciated With Distal Extension Removable Partial Dentures; Imp Dent 16: 2007 275-280
5. Keltjens HM, Kayser AF, Hertel R, Battistuzzi PC .: Dis-
6. Van der Bilt, A., Tekamp, A., Van der Colas, H. and Ab- bink, J. Bite force and electromyography during maximum unilateral and bilateral clenching. European Journal of Oral Sciences.2008 116, 217-222
7. Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Zanotti C , Tartagilia CRM. Maximal bite force in healthy young adults as predicted by surface electromyography. J Dent. 2004; 32:451-457.
8. Castroflorio T, Bracco P, Farina D. Surface electromyog- raphy in the assessment of jaw elevator muscles. J Oral Rehabil. 2008; 35:638-645 .
9. Haraldson T, Jemt T, Stalblad P, Lekholm II. Oral function in subjects with overdentures supported by osseointegrated implants. Scand J Dent Res. 1988; 96:235—242.
10. Fontijn-Tekamp FA, Slagter AP, van’t Hof MA, Ceertman ME, Kalk W. Bite forces with mandibular implant-retained overdentures. J Dent Res. 1998; 77:1832-1839.
11. Van Kampen FMC, van der Bilt A, Cune MS, Bosman F.: The influence of various attachment types in mandibular implant-retained overdentures on maximum bite force and EMC . J Dent Res. 2002; 81:170-173 .
12. Cea Drost, Dick F. Stegeman, Baziel C.M. van Engelen, Machiel J. Zwarts.: Clinical applications of high density surface EMC: A systematic review. Journal of Electromy- ography and Kinesiology. 2006; 16:586-602.
13. Ceckili O, Bilhan H, Mumcu E, Tuncer N: The Influ- ence of Maximum Bite Force on Patient Satisfaction and Quality of Life of Patients Wearing Mandibular Implant Overdentures, Journal of Oral Implantology2012,271-277: XXXVIII (3)
14. Hatch JP, Shinkai RS, Sakai S, Rugh JD, Paunovich ED. Determinants of masticatory performance in dentate adults. Arch Oral Biol. 2001;46: 641-648
15. Fontijn-Tekamp FA, Slagter AP, Van Der Bilt A: Biting and chewing in overdentures, full dentures, and natural dentitions.J Dent Res. 2000; 79: 1519-1524.
16. Lassila V, Holmlund I, Koivumaa KK.: Bite force and its correlations in different denture types. Acta Odontol Scand.1985; 43:127-132.
17. Brudvik JS . Advanced removable partial dentures. Chi- cago: Quintessence, 1999.
18. Van Waas MA, Jonkman RE, Kalk W, Van ’t Hof MA, Plooij J, Van 0s JH. Differences two years after tooth extraction in mandibular bone reduction in patients treated with immediate overdentures or with immediate complete dentures. J Dent Res.1993;72: 1001-1004.