Volume : 08, Issue : 08, August – 2021
Title:
04.A SYSTEMATIC EXAMINATION AND CONTROLLED TRIALS OF ENDOSCOPIC TRANSFORAMINUM DISCECTOMY VS TRADITIONAL LUMBAR DISCHERNIATION MICRODISCECTOMY
Authors :
Dr. Sadia Sarwar, Dr. Ammad Waheed Khan, Anood Rehman
Abstract :
Aim: The open micro discectomy is the most widely recognized surgery for the decompression of radiculopathy brought about by lumbar circle herniation. Until this point, an assortment of negligibly obtrusive (MI) strategies have been created. In the most recent many years, endoscopic procedures have been created to perform discectomy. The transformational endoscopic discectomy (TED) with posterolateral access advanced out of the improvement of endoscopic methods.
Methods: A precise writing search was performed utilizing the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library data sets for preliminaries written in English. Our current research was conducted at Mayo Hospital, Lahore from May 2019 to April 2020. The randomized preliminaries and observational examinations that met our incorporation standards were in this manner included. Two analysts separately extricated information and assessed the danger of inclination. All measurable investigations were performed utilizing Review Manager 5.3.
Results: Five planned and four review examines including 1529 patients were incorporated. The consequences of the meta-investigation demonstrated that there were critical contrasts between the two gatherings long of medical clinic stay (MD = − 9.42, 96% CI − 10.27, − 8.57; p esteem < 0.00002). Nonetheless, there were no huge contrasts in the leg visual simple scale (VAS) scores, the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores, and the frequency of complexities and repeat.
Conclusion: The transformational endoscopic discectomy is better than open micro discectomy in the length of clinic stay. Be that as it may, there were no distinctions in leg torment, practical recuperation, and rate of difficulties among TED and MD in treating LDH.
Keywords: Endoscopic transforaminum discectomy vs traditional lumbar disc herniation micro discectomy.
Cite This Article:
Please cite this article in press Sadia Sarwar al., A Systematic Examination And Controlled Trials Of Endoscopic Transforaminum Discectomy Vs Traditional Lumbar Discherniation Microdiscectomy.., Indo Am. J. P. Sci, 2021; 08(08).
Number of Downloads : 10
References:
1. Hsu HT, Chang SJ, Yang SS, Chai CL. Learning curve of full-endoscopic lumbar discectomy. Eur Spine J. 2019;22:727–33.
2. Akcakaya MO, Yorukoglu AG, Aydoseli A, Aras Y, Sabanci PA, Altunrende ME, et al. Serum creatine phosphokinase levels as an indicator of muscle injury following lumbar disc surgery: comparison of fully endoscopic discectomy and microdiscectomy. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2019;145:74–8.
3. Schizas C, Tsiridis E, Saksena J. Microendoscopic discectomy compared with standard microsurgical discectomy for treatment of uncontained or large contained disc herniations. Neurosurgery. 2015;57:357–60.
4. Fritsch EW, Heisel J, Rupp S. The failed back surgery syndrome: reasons, intraoperative findings, and long-term results: a report of 182 operative treatments. Spine. 2018;21:626–33.
5. Choi I, Ahn JO, So WS, Lee SJ, Choi IJ, Kim H. Exiting root injury in transforaminal endoscopic discectomy: preoperative image considerations for safety. Eur Spine J. 2019;22:2481–7.
6. Gempt J, Jonek M, Ringel F, Preuss A, Wolf P, Ryang Y. Long-term follow-up of standard microdiscectomy versus minimal access surgery for lumbar disc herniations. Acta Neurochir. 2019;155:2333–8.
7. Peng CW, Yeo W, Tan SB. Percutaneous endoscopic discectomy: clinical results and how it affects the quality of life. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2018;23:425–30.
8. Rahimi-Movaghar V, Rasouli M, Shokraneh F, Moradi-Lakeh M, Vakaro A, Sadeghi-Naini M. Minimally invasive discectomy versus microdiscectomy/discectomy for symptomatic lumbar disc herniation. J Inj Violence Res. 2016;4:61.
9. Gibson JN, Cowie JG, Iprenburg M. Transforaminal endoscopic spinal surgery: the future ‘gold standard’ for discectomy? A review. Surgeon. 2018;10:290–6.
10. Kamble PC, Sharma A, Singh V, Natraj B, Devani D, Khapane V. Outcome of single level disc prolapse treated with transforaminal steroid versus epidural steroid versus caudal steroids. Eur Spine J. 2016;25:217–21.