Volume : 08, Issue : 12, December – 2021
Title:
39.PROCEDURES PULPECTOMY FOR PRIMARY MOLAR TEETHING
Authors :
Lubna Siddig Emam, MAJED MOHAMMED AWADI, JABER NASSER AL ZAED, Hasnaa Eshaq Haroun Hawsawi, Sawsan Ghaith Alsharif, RANIA OMAR SAIRAFI, Ahmed Saeed M Babanjy
Abstract :
Pulpectomy is used as a treatment method for irreversibly damaged pulp tissue, and also serves as an option to prevent extraction of the tooth. In this review we discuss the background of the pulpectomy and materials used in it. Detailed search was conducted through databases; PubMed/Midline, and Embase, for these articles disusing the pulpectomy for primary molar teeth, published up to end of 2021. Pulpectomy consists of the chemical substance and additionally mechanical removing of deadly coronal as nicely as radicular pulp tissue complied with via root canal filling. It is a manner to retain the child enamel till the eruption of everlasting dentition collectively with defending its esthetics as nicely as masticatory feature. This can moreover preserve the arc size, forestall hazardous tongue habits, and additionally convert speech. Pulpectomy is a disturbing cure for children and is elaborate due to its anatomical intricacies that are not exist in permanent teeth. The very first treatment choice for the young client is whether to keep or extract these teeth.
Cite This Article:
Please cite this article in press Lubna Siddig Emam et al, Procedures Pulpectomy For Primary Molar Teething, Indo Am. J. P. Sci, 2021; 08(12).
Number of Downloads : 10
References:
1. Nagaveni NB, Radhika NB, Umashankar KV. Knowledge, attitude and practices of parents regarding primary teeth care of their children in Davangere city, India. Pesq Bras Odontoped Clin Integr, João Pessoa 2011 Jan;11(1):129-132.
2. Sarnat H, Kagan A, Raviv A. The relation between mother’s attitude towards dentistry and oral health status of their children. Pediatr Dent 1984;6(3):128-131.
3. Machida Y. Root canal obturation in primary teeth: a review. Jap Dent Assoc J. 1983; 36:796–802.
4. Setty JV and Srinivasan I. Knowledge and Awareness of Primary Teeth and Their Importance among Parents in Bengaluru City, India (2016) Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 9: 56- 61.
5. Watt RG. Parental knowledge and attitudes to oral health (2002) Br Dent J 193: 651-654.
6. Keyes PH. Research in dental caries. J Am Dent Assoc 1968 Jun;76:1357-1373.
7. Mikkelsen L. Effect of sucrose intake on numbers of bacteria in plaque expressing extracellular carbohydrate metabolizing enzymes. Caries Res 1996;30:65-70.
8. Tanzer JM, Livingston J, Thompson AM. The microbiology of primary dental caries in humans. J Dent Educ 2001;65:1028-1037.
9. Chan KM, King NM, Kilpalrick SM. Can infants catch caries? A review of 26, the current evidence on the infectious nature of dental caries in infants. NZ Dent 2O05 Mar; 101:4-ll.
10. Wait AK, Seow WK, Purdie DM, et al. A longitudinal study of Streptococcus mutans colonization in infants after tooth eruption. J Dent Res 2003:82:504-508.
11. Dye BA, Shenkin JD, Ogden CL, et al. The relationship between healthful eating practices and dental caries in children aged 2-5 years in the United States, 1988-1994. J Am Dent Assoc 2004;135:55-66.
12. Gussy MG, Waters EG, Walsh O, et al. Early childhood caries: current evidence for aetiology and prevention. J Paediatr Child Health 2006 Jan-Feb;42:37-43.
13. Lo EC, Holmgren CJ, Hu D, Van Palenstein Helderman W. Six-year follow up of atraumatic restorative treatment restorations placed in Chinese school children. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2007;35(5):387-92.
14. Siqueira JF Jr, Rôças IN, Paiva SS, Guimarães-Pinto T, Magalhaes KM, Lima KC. Bacteriologic investigation of the effects of sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine during the endodontic treatment of teeth with apical periodontitis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007;104(1):122-30.
15. Dummett CO Jr, Kopel HM. Pediatric endodontics. In: Ingle JI, Bakland LK, editors. Endodontics. 5th ed. Hamilton: BC Decker Inc.; 2002. p. 861‑902.
16. McDonald RE, Avery DR, Dean JA. Treatment of deep caries, vital pulp exposure and pulpless teeth. In: Dean JA, Avery DR, McDonald RE, editors. McDonald and Avery’s Denitstry for the Child and Adolescent. 9th ed. Missouri: Mosby Elsevier; 2011. p. 343‑65.
17. Ruby JD, Cox CF, Mitchell SC, Makhija S, Chompu‑Inwai P, Jackson J. A randomized study of sodium hypochlorite versus formocresol pulpotomy in primary molar teeth. Int J Paediatr Dent 2013;23:145‑52.
18. Estrela C, Sydney GB, Bammann LL, Felippe O Jr (1995) Mechanism of action of calcium and hydroxyl ions of calcium hydroxide on tissue and bacteria. Braz Dent J 6: 85-90.
19. Sadrian R, Coll JA. A long-term follow-up on the reten- tion rate of zinc oxide eugenol filler after primary tooth pulpectomy. Pediatr Dent 1993;15:249-53.
20. Coll JA, Sadrian R. Predicting pulpectomy success and its relationship to exfoliation and succedaneous dentition. Pediatr Dent 1996;18:57-63.
21. Mani SA, Chawla HS, Tewari A, Goyal A. Evaluation of calcium hydroxide and zinc oxide eugenol as root canal filling materials in primary teeth. J Dent Child 2000;67: 83, 142-7.
22. Castagnola L, Orlay HG (1952) Treatment of gangrene of the pulp by the Walkhoff method. Br Dent J 93: 93-102.
23. Erasquin J, Muruzabal M (1967) Root canal fillings with zinc oxide eugenol in the rat molar. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 24: 547-558.
24. Lin B, Zhao Y, Yang J, Wang W, Ge LH. Effects of zinc oxide-eugenol and calcium hydroxide/ iodoform on delaying root resorption in deciduous molars without successors. Dent Mater J 2014; 33: 471-5.
25. Estrela C, Estrela CR, Hollanda AC, Decurcio Dde A, Pecora JD. Influence of iodoform on antimicrobial potential of calcium hydroxide. J Appl Oral Sci 2006; 14: 33-7.
26. Harini Priya M, Bhat SS, Sundeep Hegde K. Comparative evaluation of bactericidal potential of four root canal filling materials against microflora of infected non-vital primary teeth. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2010; 35: 23-9.
27. Nakornchai S, Banditsing P, Visetratana N. Clinical evaluation of 3Mix and Vitapex as treatment options for pulpally involve deciduous molars. Int J Paediatr Dent 2010; 20: 214-21.
28. Ozalp N, Saroğlu I, Sönmez H. Evaluation of various root canal filling materials in primary molar pulpectomies: an in vivo study. Am J Dent 2005; 18: 347-50.
29. Howley B, Seale NS, McWhorter AG, Kerins C, Boozer KB, Lindsey D. Pulpotomy versus pulpectomy for carious vital primary incisors: randomized controlled trial. Pediatr Dent 2012; 34: 112- 9.
30. Subramaniam P, Gilhotra K. Endoflas, zinc oxide eugenol and metapex as root canal filling materials in primary molars–a comparative clinical study. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2011; 35: 365-9.
31. Gupta S, Das G. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of zinc oxide eugenol and metapex in root canal treatment of primary teeth. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2011; 29: 222-8.
32. McDonald RE, Avery DR, Dean JA. Treatment of deep caries,
33. vital pulp exposure and pulpless teeth. In: Dean JA, Avery DR,
34. McDonald RE, editors. McDonald and Avery’s Denitstry for the Child
35. and Adolescent. 9 th
36. ed. Missouri: Mosby Elsevier; 2011. p. 343 65.
37. 15. Ruby JD, Cox CF, Mitchell SC, Makhija S, Chompu Inwai P,
38. Jackson J. A randomized study of sodium hypochlorite versus
39. formocresol pulpotomy in primary molar teeth. Int J Paediatr Dent
40. 2013;23:145 52.