Volume : 08, Issue : 06, June – 2021

Title:

02.MISALIGNED SPINE BECAUSE OF DIFFERENT MUSCLES: A LITERATURE REVIEW

Authors :

Dr. Raymond L Venter

Abstract :

The typical sagittal curvature exemplifies proper body posture. Cervical and thoracic spines are inwardly curved (backward) (kyphosis). The pelvis is shifted forward, but the lower limbs maintain their level position. However, the optimal alignment of the body varies significantly.
The most frequently observed abnormalities of body posture in the sagittal plane are as follows: lordotic, kyphotic One’s posture affects both the skeletal and muscular systems, putting additional strain on the supporting structures. Changes in muscle length or lengthening typically manifest muscle abnormalities. However, reports indicate that when the muscles that support your body (occasionally referred to as stabilizers) are not used for an extended period, such as while you are sitting in one position, your posture may be compromised due to the hypo reaction. When the locomotor system’s stability cannot be maintained, the musculoskeletal system takes over. However, it has the unintended consequence of increasing rigidity and inflexibility in the musculoskeletal system.
Keywords: spinal misalignment, Sway-back posture, Flat-back posture, Kyphotic posture, Lordotic posture, Faults of body posture, Corrective exercises, Body posture.

Cite This Article:

Please cite this article in press Raymond L Venter et al., Misaligned Spine Because Of Different Muscles: A Literature Review.., Indo Am. J. P. Sci, 2021; 08(06).

Number of Downloads : 10

References:

1. Raymond L Venter., Environmental Energy for Cellular Growth And Repair Especially By Bio-Resonance Focused Ultrasound: A Literature Review., Indo Am. J. P. Sci, 2021; 08(04).
2. Raymond L Venter., Role Of Bio-Resonance Focused Ultrasound On Stem Cell Proliferation And Growth: A Review.., Indo Am. J. P. Sci, 2021; 08(04).
3. Irene H James., Cellular Destruction From Environmental Energy Exposure Especially By Cell Phones And Mobile Internet.., Indo Am. J. P. Sci, 2021; 08(04).
4. Raymond L Venter., Focused Ultrasound Involving The Usage Of Cell Resonance To Understand The Effect And Its Use As A Therapy For Disease Modification.,Indo Am. J. P. Sci, 2021; 08(03).
5. James, D. I. H. (2021, May). RECORDING AND INTERPRETATION OF CELLULAR BIO-RESONANCE FOR THE IDENTIFICATION OF CELLULAR HEALTH STATUS: A DIAGNOSTIC AND THERAPEUTICS LITERATURE REVIEW. WORLD JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL AND MEDICAL RESEARCH, 7(5), 303-309. https://www.wjpmr.com/home/article_abstract/3505
6. Venter, D. R. L. (2021, May). ROLE OF BIO-RESONANCE FOCUSED ULTRASOUND ON STEM CELL PROLIFERATION AND GROWTH: A REVIEW. WORLD JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL AND MEDICAL RESEARCH, 7(5), 310-315. https://www.wjpmr.com/home/article_abstract/3506
7. Claus A, Hides JA, Moseley GL, Hodges PW. Different ways to balance the spine: subtle changes in sagittal spinal curves affect regional muscle activity. Spine. 2009;34(6):208–214. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181908ead.
8. O’Sullivan PB, Grahamslaw KM, Kendell M, et al. The effect of different standing and sitting postures on trunk muscle activity in a pain-free population. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2002;27:1238–1244. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200206010-00019.
9. Kendall F, McCreary E, Provance PG, Rodgers M, Romani WA. Muscle testing and function with posture and pain. Baltimore: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2005.
10. Janssen MM, Kouwenhoven JW, Schlösser TP, Viergever MA, Bartels LW, Castelein RM, Vincken KL. Analysis of preexistent vertebral rotation in the normal infantile, juvenile, and adolescent spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2011;36(7):486–491. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181f468cc.
11. Levangie PK, Norkin CC. Joint structure and function: a comprehensive analysis. F.A. Davis Company, 2005.
12. McGill S. Low Back Disorders-3rd Edition with Web Resource: Evidence-Based Prevention and Rehabilitation. Human Kinetics; 3 edition, Champaign, USA; 2015.
13. Sahrmann S. Diagnosis and treatment of movement impairment syndromes. St. Louis: Mosby; 2002.
14. Comerford M, Mottram S. Kinetic control—e-book: the management of uncontrolled movement. 2012.
15. Bergmark A. Stability of the lumbar spine. A study in the mechanical engineering. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl. 1989;230:20–24.
16. Richardson CA, Hodges PW, Hides J. Therapeutic exercise for lumbopelvic stabilization: a motor control approach for the treatment and prevention of low back pain. 2. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 2004.
17. Richardson C. The muscle designation debate: the experts respond. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2000;4(4):235–236.
18. Richardson C, Bullock MI. Changes in muscle activity during fast alternating flexion-extension movements of the knee. Scand J of Rehabil Med. 1986;18:51–58.
19. Appell HJ. Muscular atrophy following immobilization: a review. Sports Med. 1990;10:42. doi: 10.2165/00007256-199010010-00005.
20. Hides JA, Stokes MJ, Saide M, Jull GA, Cooper DH. Evidence of lumbar multifidus muscle wasting ipsilateral to symptoms in patients with acute/subacute low back pain. Spine. 1994;19:165–172. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199401001-00009.
21. Dilani Mendis M, Hides JA, Wilson SJ, Grimaldi A, Belavý DL, Stanton W, Felsenberg D, Rittweger J, Richardson C. Effect of prolonged bed rest on the anterior hip muscles. Gait Posture. 2009;30(4):533–537. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.08.002.
22. Hides JA, Belavý DL, Stanton W, Wilson SJ, Rittweger J, Felsenberg D, Richardson CA. Magnetic resonance imaging assessment of trunk muscles during prolonged bed rest. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2007;32(15):1687–1692. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318074c386.
23. Hides JA, Lambrecht G, Stanton WR, Damann V. Changes in multifidus and abdominal muscle size in response to microgravity: possible implications for low back pain research. Eur Spine J. 2016;25(Suppl 1):175–182. doi: 10.1007/s00586-015-4311-5.
24. Hides JA, Belavý DL, Cassar L, Williams M, Wilson SJ, Richardson CA. Altered response of the anterolateral abdominal muscles to simulated weight-bearing in subjects with low back pain. Eur Spine J. 2009;18(3):410–418. doi: 10.1007/s00586-008-0827-2.
25. Reeve A, Dilley A. Effects of posture on the thickness of transversus abdominis in pain-free subjects. Man Ther. 2009;14(6):679–684. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2009.02.008.
26. Bogduk N, Twomey LT. Clinical anatomy of the lumbar spine. 2. London: Chruchill Livingstone; 1991.
27. Hides JA, Lambrecht G, Richardson CA, Stanton WR, Armbrecht G, Pruett C, Damann V, Felsenberg D, Belavý DL. The effects of rehabilitation on the muscles of the trunk following prolonged bed rest. Eur Spine J. 2011;20(5):808–818. doi: 10.1007/s00586-010-1491-x.
28. Belavý DL, Richardson CA, Wilson SJ, Rittweger J, Felsenberg D. Superficial lumbopelvic muscle overactivity and decreased cocontraction after 8 weeks of bed rest. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2007;32(1):232–239. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000250170.53746.27.
29. Lee DG. The Pelvic Girdle: An integration of clinical expertise and research. Churchill Livingstone; 4 edition USA; 2010.
30. Bullock-Saxton J, Murphy D, Norris C, Richardson C, Tunnel P. The muscle designation debate: the experts respond. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2000;4(4):225–257. doi: 10.1054/jbmt.2000.0180.
31. Kędra A, Czaprowski D. Sedentary behaviours of 10-19-year-old students with and without spinal pain. Probl Hig Epidemiol. 2015;1(96):143–148.
32. Czaprowski D, Stoliński Ł, Szczygieł A, Kędra A. Sedentary behaviours of girls and boys aged 7-15. Polish Journal of Public Health. 2011;121(3):248–252.
33. Solberg G. Postural disorders & musculoskeletal dysfunction. Diagnosis, prevention and treatment. Philadelphia: Elsevier Churchill Livingstone; 2008.
34. Gajdosik RL, Albert CR, Mitman JJ. Influence of hamstring length on the standing position and flexion range of motion of the pelvic angle, lumbar angle, and thoracic angle. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1994;20(4):213–219. doi: 10.2519/jospt.1994.20.4.213.
35. Fujitani R, Jiromaru T, Kida N, Nomura T. Effect of standing postural deviations on trunk and hip muscle activity. J Phys Ther Sci. 2017;29(7):1212–1215. doi: 10.1589/jpts.29.1212.
36. Crosible J, Kilbreath SL, Hollman L, et al. . Scapulohumeral rhythm and associated spinal motion. Clin Biomech. 2008;23:184–192
37. Crosible J, Kilbreath SL, Dylke E, et al. . Effect of mastectomy on shoulder and spinal kinematics during bilateral upper-limb movement. Physical. 2010;90:679–692
38. Yamamoto D, Tanaka Y, Tsubota Y, et al. . Immediate breast reconstruction for breast cancer. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2014;41:1892–1894
39. Fischer JP, Fox JP, Nelson JA, et al. . A longitudinal assessment of outcomes and healthcare resource utilization after immediate breast reconstruction-comparing implant- and autologous-based breast reconstruction. Ann Surg. 2015;262:692–699.
40. Atanes Mendes Peres AC, Dias de Oliveira Latorre MD, Yugo Maesaka J, et al. . Body posture after mastectomy: comparison between immediate breast reconstruction versus mastectomy alone. Physiother Res Int. 2017;22:1
41. Mazzocchi M, Dessy LA, Di Ronza S, et al. . A study of postural changes after breast reduction. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2012;36:1311–1319
42. Mazzocchi M, Dessy LA, Iodice P, et al. . A study of postural changes after breast augmentation. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2012;36:570–577