Volume : 09, Issue : 04, April – 2022
Title:
60.AN OVERVIEW OF IMAGING FLUORESCENCE METHOD AND RISK ASSESSMENT
Authors :
Duaa Mahmoud Gazzaz,Ghadeer Hamzah Najjar,Hatim Mustafa Almasri,Omar Ahmed Alkhairi,Ahmed Mohammed Abdullah ALAnsari,Hassan Jamal Jeddawi,Mohammed Muslim Salm Alharbi,Abdalgader Mohammed Faizo,Hatan Ghazi Sarhan
Abstract :
The discipline of fluorescence microscopy is expanding rapidly and provides biologists increasingly more imaging capabilities. In the past ten years, numerous new imaging technologies and techniques have been created that permit deeper, faster, and higher resolution imaging. We reviewed the literature through out the 2022, for all relevant published studies in English language. Numerous cellular and subcellular activities in vivo can be labeled with a variety of innovative fluorescence reporter technologies. This imposed contrast is now captured by a growing range of imaging techniques that provide novel ways to view and quantify fluorescent markers scattered throughout tissues. This is a developing branch of imaging sciences that has made significant progress but also faces significant obstacles. Nonetheless, it is poised to have a big impact on biological research, drug discovery, and clinical practice in the next years.
Cite This Article:
Please cite this article in press Duaa Mahmoud Gazzaz et al., An Overview Of Imaging Fluorescence Method And Risk Assessment.., Indo Am. J. P. Sci, 2022; 09 (04).
Number of Downloads : 10
References:
1. Kuma, A., Matsui, M. & Mizushima, N. LC3, an autophagosome marker, can be incorporated into protein aggregates independent of autophagy: caution in the interpretation of LC3 localization. Autophagy 3, 323–328 (2007).
2. Katayama, H., Kogure, T., Mizushima, N., Yoshimori, T. & Miyawaki, A. A sensitive and quantitative technique for detecting autophagic events based on lysosomal delivery. Chem. Biol. 18, 1042–1052 (2011).
3. Rosado, C.J., Mijaljica, D., Hatzinisiriou, I., Prescott, M. & Devenish, R.J. Rosella: a fluorescent pH-biosensor for reporting vacuolar turnover of cytosol and organelles in yeast. Autophagy 4, 205–213 (2008).
4. Chan, D.C. Fusion and fission: interlinked processes critical for mitochondrial health. Annu. Rev. Genet. 46, 265–287 (2012).
5. Westermann, B. Mitochondrial fusion and fission in cell life and death. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 11, 872–884 (2010).
6. Chen, H. & Chan, D.C. Mitochondrial dynamics—fusion, fission, movement, and mitophagy—in neurodegenerative diseases. Hum. Mol. Genet. 18, R169–176 (2009).
7. Zipfel WR, Williams RM, Webb WW. 2003. Nonlinear magic: multiphoton microscopy in the biosciences. Nat. Biotechnol. 21:1368–76
8. Stephens DJ, Allan VJ. 2003. Light microscopy techniques for live cell imaging. Science 300:82–86
9. Huisken J, Swoger J, Del Bene F, Wittbrodt J, Stelzer EHK. 2004. Optical sectioning deep inside live embryos by selective plane illumination microscopy. Science 305:1007–9
10. Sharpe J, Ahlgren U, Perry P, Hill B, Ross A, et al. 2002. Optical projection tomography as a tool for 3D microscopy and gene expression studies. Science 296:541–45
11. Alexandrakis G, Brown EB, Tong RT, McKee TD, RB Campbell, et al. 2004. Two-photon fluorescence correlation microscopy reveals the two-phase nature of transport in tumors. Nat. Med. 10:203–7
12. Toomre D, Manstein DJ. 2001. Lighting up the cell surface with evanescent wave microscopy. Trends Cell Biol. 11:298–303
13. Zoumi A, Yeh A, Tromberg BJ. 2002. Imaging cells and extracellular matrix in vivo by using second-harmonic generation and two-photon excited fluorescence. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 99:1101419
14. Boas DA, Brooks DH, Miller EL, DiMarzio CA, Kilmer M, et al. 2001. Imaging the body with diffuse optical tomography. IEEE Signal Proc. Mag. 18:57–75.
15. Ntziachristos V, Chance B. 2001. Probing physiology and molecular function using optical imaging: applications to breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 3:41–46.
16. Gibson AP, Hebden JC, Arridge SR. 2005. Recent advances in diffuse optical imaging. Phys. Med. Biol. 50:R1–43.
17. Chamberlain C, Hahn KM. 2000. Watching proteins in the wild: fluorescence methods to study protein dynamics in living cells. Traffic 1:755–62
18. van Roessel P, Brand AH. 2002. Imaging into the future: visualizing gene expression and protein interactions with fluorescent proteins. Nat. Cell Biol. 4:E15–20
19. Ichikawa T, Hogemann D, Saeki Y, Tyminski E, Terada K, et al. 2002. MRI of transgene expression: correlation to therapeutic gene expression. Neoplasia 4:523–30
20. Tjuvajev JG, Chen SH, Joshi A, Joshi R, Guo ZS, et al. 1999. Imaging adenoviral-mediated herpes virus thymidine kinase gene transfer and expression in vivo. Cancer Res. 59:5186–93
21. Tung CH, Zeng Q, Shah K, Kim DE, Schellingerhout D, Weissleder R. 2004. In vivo imaging of beta-galactosidase activity using far red fluorescent switch. Cancer Res. 64:1579–83
22. Ntziachristos V, Tung C, Bremer C, Weissleder R. 2002. Fluorescencemediated tomography resolves protease activity in vivo. Nat. Med. 8:757–60
23. Roy R, Godavarty A, Sevick-Muraca EM. 2003. Fluorescence-enhanced optical tomography using referenced measurements of heterogeneous media. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 22:824–36
24. Soubret A, Ripoll J, Ntziachristos V. 2005. Accuracy of fluorescent tomography in the presence of heterogeneities: study of the normalized Born ratio. IEEE Med. Imag. 24(10):1369–76
25. Klose AD, Hielscher AH. 2003. Fluorescence tomography with simulated data based on the equation of radiative transfer. Opt. Lett. 28:1019–21
26. Dehghani H, Arridge SR, Schweiger M, Delpy DT. 2000. Optical tomography in the presence of void regions. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A Opt. Image Sci. Vis. 17:1659–70
27. Klose AD, Ntziachristos V, Hielscher AH. 2005. The inverse source problem based on the radiative transfer equation in optical molecular imaging. J. Comput. Phys. 202:323–45