Volume : 09, Issue : 02, February – 2022

Title:

20.OUTCOMES OF MODIFIED NEGATIVE PRESSURE WOUND THERAPY

Authors :

Dr. Faryal, Dr. Muhammad Zahid Iqbal, Dr. Hassan Khan

Abstract :

Background: Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) or Vacuum Assisted Closure (VAC) is a method used to cover large wounds, decubitus ulcers and open fractures which cannot be closed either primarily or secondarily and which often requires skin graft or flaps or complex reconstructive procedure to cover the wound.
Methods: We applied our modification of NPWT in 128 patients on large wounds, neglected wounds, large decubitus ulcers, fasciotomies and open fractures. Compared to the patented VAC system, our modification included presterilized foam, Saran® wrap or Glad® wrap, infant feeding tube or a nasogastric tube and bed side suction machine.
Results: Majority of our cases were from open fractures. There were 98 cases of large soft tissue wounds, 3 cases of fasciotomies for compartment syndrome, 7 cases of peri-operative trauma infections, 16 cases of diabetic wounds and 4 decubitus ulcers. In our study, the average number of modified NPWT changes is 3 to 4, average number of days between modified NPWT changes is 3 to 5 days, and length of time modified NPWT applied before closure is 14 to 21 days. Most frequent mode of coverage is Split Thickness Skin Graft obviating the need of more complex flaps and microvascular reconstructive procedures.
Conclusion: Our modifications are not inferior to the patented VAC but works just as well. The costs of our modifications are much less than the patented VAC, which is economical for our setting.

Cite This Article:

Please cite this article in press Faryal et al, Outcomes Of Modified Negative Pressure Wound Therapy., Indo Am. J. P. Sci, 2022; 09(2).

Number of Downloads : 10

References:

1. Aronson J. Limb-Lengthening, Skeletal Reconstruction, and Bone Transport with the Ilizarov Method. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1997;79:1243-58.
2. Lawrence XW, Hans CP. Current Thought Regarding the Mechanism of Action of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy with Reticulated Open Cell Foam. J Orthop Trauma 2008;22:135-7.
3. Kilpadi DV, Feeley TD, Kiel JW. V.A.C. Therapy Normalizes Vascular Response of Injured Tissue in
Full-Thickness Wounds in Rabbits. Ann Plast Surg 2007;58: 555–60.
4. Clare MP, Fitzgibbons TC, McMullen ST, et al. Experience with the vacuum assisted closure negative pressure technique in the treatment of non-healing diabetic and dysvascular wounds. Foot Ankle Int 2002;23:896-901.
5. Cothren CC, Moore EE, Johnson JL, et al. One hundred percent fascial approximation with sequential abdominal closure of the open abdomen. Am J Surg 2011;192:238-42.
6. Saxena V, Hwang CW, Huang S, et al. Vacuumassisted closure: microdeformations of wounds and cell proliferation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004;114:1086–96.
7. Scholl L, Chang E, Reitz B, et al. Sternal osteomyelitis: use of vacuum-assisted closure device as an adjunct to definitive closure with sternectomy and muscle flap reconstruction. J Card Surg 2004;19:453-61.
8. Morykwas MJ, Argenta LC, Shelton-Brown EI, et al. Vacuum assisted closure: a new method for wound control and treatment. Animal studies and basic foundation. Ann Plast Surg. 1997;38:553-62.
9. Morykwas MJ, Simpson J, Punger K, et al. Vacuumassisted closure: state of basic research and physiologic function. Plast Reconstr Surg (7 suppl) 2011;17:121-6.
10. Gouler. University of Machigan: ICL lecture on VAC in open tibial fractures in AAOS meeting 2004.
11. DeFranzo AJ, Argenta LC, Marks MW, et al. The use of vacuum-assisted closure therapy for the treatment of lower-extremity wounds with exposed bone. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001;108:1184–91.
12. Wackenfors A, Sjogren J, Gustafsson R, et al. Effects of vacuum-assisted closure therapy on inguinal wound edge microvascular blood flow. Wound Rep Regen. 2004;12:6,600-6.
13. Herscovici D, Sanders RW, Scaduto JM, et al. Vacuumassisted wound closure (VAC Therapy) for the management of patients with high-energy soft tissue injuries. J Orthop Trauma 2003;17:683-8.
14. Leininger BE, Rasmussen TE, Smith DL, et al. Experience with wound VAC and delayed primary closure of contaminated soft tissue injuries in Iraq. J Trauma 2011;61:1207-11.
15. Schlatterer D, Hirshorn K. Negative Pressure Wound Therapy With Reticulated Open Cell Foam—Adjunctive Treatment in the Management of Traumatic Wounds of the Leg: A Review of the Literature. J Orthop Trauma 2008;22:152-60.
16. Pollak AN, McCarthy ML, Burgess AR. Short-term wound complications after application of flaps for coverage of traumatic soft-tissue defects about the tibia. The Lower Extremity Assessment Project (LEAP) Study Group. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2000:82:1681–91.
17. Preston G. An overview of topical negative pressure therapy in wound care. Nursing Standard 2008;23,7:62-8.
18. Webb LX, Dedmond B, Schlatterer D, et al. The contaminated highenergy open fracture: a protocol to prevent and treat inflammatory mediator storm-induced soft-tissue compartment syndrome (IMSICS). J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2011;14(Suppl):82-6.
19. Parrett BM, Matros E, Pribaz JJ, et al. Lower extremity trauma: trends in the management of soft-tissue reconstruction of open tibia-fibula fractures. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011;117:1315-22.
20. Braakenburg A, Obdeijn MC, Van Rooij IALM, et al. The clinical efficacy and cost effectiveness of the vacuum-assisted closure technique in the management of acute and chronic wounds: a randomized controlled trial. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011;118:390-7.
21. Vuersteak JD, Vainas T, Wuite J, et al. State of the art treatment of chronic leg ulcers: a randomized controlled trial comparing vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) with modern wound dressings. J Vasc Surg 2011;44:1029-37.
22. Moues CM, Vos MC, Van Den Bemd GCM, et al. Bacterial load in relation to vacuum-assisted closure wound therapy: a prospective randomized trial. Wound Rep Regen 2004;12:11-7.