Volume : 09, Issue : 01, January – 2022

Title:

25.AN OVERVIEW OF DIFFERENT MATERIAL AND ADVANTAGES USED IN DENTAL HYBRID PROSTHESIS

Authors :

Abdullah Faisal Alim, Hebah Moneib Alkhateeb, Ahlam Yahya Bakhsh, Ghayah Abdu Alasiri, Majdah Ibrahim Mohd Mali, Abdulkareem Ismail Abdulkareem Khuzami

Abstract :

Background: Sepsis-induced acute kidney injury (S-AKI) is a typical complexity in hospitalized and basically sick patients, which expands the danger of creating constant comorbidities and is related with incredibly high mortality.
Objective: This study aimed at providing an update on polymorphism identified in sepsis induced acute kidney injury.
Methods: The online database was searched then the articles were evaluated then all the eligible English studies during the last 10years were included in the study.
Results:there were 31 studies included focusing on the association between gene polymorphism and AKI induced by sepsis in which 13 gene polymorphisms were studied.
Conclusion: The genetic structure of the individuals can impact the vulnerability and severity of AKI. Most of the gene polymorphisms can’t induce AKI alone but can act with other genetic disturbances and depends on the health state of patients and their compromised state. Thus, AkI is supposed to be influenced by genetic factors with different pathological pathways.
Keywords: polymorphism, sepsis induced acute kidney injury

Cite This Article:

Please cite this article in press Abdullah Faisal Alim et al, An Overview Of Different Material And Advantages Used In Dental Hybrid Prosthesis ., Indo Am. J. P. Sci, 2022; 09(1).

Number of Downloads : 10

References:

1. El Askary AE. 2nd ed. Ames, Iowa, USA: Munksgaard, Blackwell; 2007. Fundamentals of Esthetic Implant Dentistry; p. 13.
2. Misch CE. St. Louis, MO: Mosby Elsevier; 2008. Contemporary Implant Dentistry; p. 99.p. 100.
3. Thalji G, Bryington M, De Kok IJ, Cooper LF. Prosthodontic management of implant therapy. Dent Clin North Am. 2014;58:207–25.
4. Zarb GAJT. Prosthodontic procedures. In: Brånemark PI, Zarb G, Albrektsson T, Eds. Tissue-integrated prostheses: osseointegration in clinical dentistry 1985, Chicago: Quintessence Publishing Co., Inc.
5. Gonzalez J. The evolution of dental materials for hybrid prosthesis. Open Dent J. 2014;8:85–94. Published 2014 May 16. doi:10.2174/1874210601408010085.
6. Egilmez F, Ergun G, Cekic-Nagas I, Bozkaya S. Implant-supported hybrid prosthesis: Conventional treatment method for borderline cases. Eur J Dent. 2015;9(3):442–448. doi:10.4103/1305-7456.163324.
7. Real-Osuna J, Almendros-Marques N, Gay-Escoda C. Prevalence of complications after the oral rehabilitation with implant-supported hybrid prostheses. Medicina Oral 2012:e116–21.
8. Gallucci GO, Doughtie CB, Hwang J-W, Fiorellini JP, Weber Q5 HP. Five-year results of fixed implant-supported rehabilitations with distal cantilevers for the edentulous mandible. Clinical Oral Implants Research 2009.
9. Attard NJ, Zarb GA. Long-term treatment outcomes in edentulous patients with implant-fixed prostheses: the Toronto study. International Journal of Prosthodontics 2004;17:417–24.
10. Bra’nemark PI, Svensson B, van Steenberghe D. Ten-year survival rates of fixed prostheses on four or six implants ad modum Bra˚nemark in full edentulism. Clinical Oral Implants Research 1995;6:227–31.
11. Kwon, T., Bain, P. A., & Levin, L. (2014). Systematic review of short- (5–10 years) and long-term (10 years or more) survival and success of full-arch fixed dental hybrid prostheses and supporting implants. Journal of Dentistry, 42(10), 1228–1241.
12. Jemt T. Failures and complications in 391 consecutively inserted fixed prostheses supported by Brånemark implants in edentulous jaws: a study of treatment from the time of prosthesis placement to the first annual checkup. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1991;6:270-6.
13. Purcell BA, McGlumphy EA, Holloway JA, Beck FM. Prosthetic complications in mandibular metal-resin implant-fixed complete dental prostheses: a 5- to 9-year analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008;23:847-57.
14. Carlson B, Carlsson GE. Prosthodontic complications in osseointegrated dental implant treat-ment. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1994;9:90-4.
15. Goodacre CJ, Bernal G, Rungcharassaeng K, Kan JY. Clinical complications with implants and implant prostheses. J Prosthet Dent. 2003;90:121-32.
16. Nedir R, Bischof M, Szmukler-Moncler S, Belser UC, Samson J. Prosthetic complications with dental implants: from an up-to-8- year experience in private practice. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2006;21:919-28.
17. Aglietta M, Siciliano VI, Zwahlen M, Brägger U, Pjetursson BE, Lang NP, et al. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of implant supported fixed dental prostheses with cantilever extensions after an observation period of at least 5 years. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20:441-51.
18. Zarb GA, Jansson T. Prosthodontic procedures. In: Branemark PI, Zarb G, Albrektsson T (eds): Tissue Integrated Prostheses: Osseointegration in Clinical Dentistry. Chicago, Quintessence, 1985, pp. 262.
19. Carr AB, McGivney GP, Brown DT (eds): Denture base considerations. In: McCracken’s Removable Partial Prosthodontics (ed 11). St. Louis, Elsevier Mosby, 2005, pp. 131.
20. Zarb GA, Schmitt A: The longitudinal clinical effectiveness of osseointegrated dental implants: the Toronto study. Part III: Problems and complications encountered. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64:185-194.
21. O’Brien WJ: Dental Materials and Their Selection (ed 4). Chicago, Quintessence, 2008, pp. 196-197.
22. Moffa JP: Biological effects of nickel-containing dental alloys. Council on Dental Materials, Instruments, and Equipment. J Am Dent Assoc 1982;104:501-505
23. Pieralini AR, Benjamin CM, Ribeiro RF, et al: The effect of coating patterns with spinel-based investment on the castability and porosity of titanium cast into three phosphate-bonded investments. J Prosthodont 2010;19:517-522
24. White S, Mildus V, McLaren E: Flexural strength of a layered zirconia and porcelain dental all-ceramic system. J Prosthet Dent 2005;94:125-131