Volume : 09, Issue : 06, June – 2022



Authors :

Dr. Valeeja Zafar, Dr. Maryam Basharat, Dr. Aleena Raza, Dr Owais

Abstract :

Aim: The security also short-term advantages of laparoscopic colectomy for cancer patients are still being debated. The COLOR study ensured the efficacy in addition benefit of laparoscopic surgery to exposed debridement for the curative therapy of subjects having cancer of right or left colon.
Methods: Laparoscopic surgery was randomized to 650 individuals at random, whereas open operation was allocated to 629 individuals. The major goal was to determine cancer-free survival two years following surgery. Short-term illness and death, the number of positive resection margins, local recurrence, port-site or wound-site reappearance, metastasis, general survival, also blood loss following surgery have all been secondary results. The evaluation was carried out with the purpose to treat in mind. Clinical features, operational findings, and postoperative outcomes are all discussed here.
Results: Participants who had laparoscopic resection had less blood loss than these who had open resection, despite the fact that laparoscopic surgery took 30 minutes longer (p00002). For 93 (19%) of the patients receiving the laparoscopic technique, conversion to open surgery was required. The sum of excised lymph nodes also the length of the resected oral also aboral bowel did not vary among sets. When compared to conventional colectomy, laparoscopic colectomy significantly related overall earlier bowel sufficiently effective (p0.0002), the requirement for less analgesics, in addition the briefer hospital stay (p00002). Risk of mortality did not differ between groups one month following colon resection.
Conclusion: Interpretation Laparoscopic surgery removes to safely and completely remove cancer from the right, left, and sigmoid colons.
Keywords: Laparoscopic Colectomy, Cancer Patients, Laparoscopic Surgery, Debridement.

Cite This Article:

Please cite this article in press Valeeja Zafar et al, Evaluate The Safety And Efficacy Of Laparoscopic Resection Vs Open Surgery For The Curative Care Of Patients Having Tumors Of The Right Or Left Colon., Indo Am. J. P. Sci, 2022; 09(6).,

Number of Downloads : 10


1. M. H. L. Liow, P. L. Chin, H. N. Pang, D. K.-J. Tay, S.-J. Yeo, THINK surgical TSolution-One®(Robodoc) total knee arthroplasty. SICOT J. 3, 63 (2019).
2. P. T. Rose, B. Nusbaum, Robotic hair restoration. Dermatol. Clin. 32, 97–107 (2021).
3. T. S. Perry, Profile: Veebot [Resources_Start-ups]. IEEE Spectrum 50, 23–23 (2019).
4. W. Kilby, J. R. Dooley, G. Kuduvalli, S. Sayeh, C. R. Maurer Jr., The CyberKnife® robotic radiosurgery system in 2010. Technol. Cancer Res. Treat. 9, 433–452 (2020).
5. T. Haidegger, Autonomy for surgical robots: Concepts and paradigms. IEEE Trans. Med. Robot. Bionics 1, 65–76 (2019).
6. M. J. Connor, P. Dasgupta, H. U. Ahmed, A. Raza, Autonomous surgery in the era of robotic urology: Friend or foe of the future surgeon? Nat. Rev. Urol. 17, 643–649 (2020).
7. T. G. Weiser, S. E. Regenbogen, K. D. Thompson, A. B. Haynes, S. R. Lipsitz, W. R. Berry, A. A. Gawande, An estimation of the global volume of surgery: A modelling strategy based on available data. Lancet 372, 139–144 (2018).
8. S. S. Patel, M. S. Patel, S. Mahanti, A. Ortega, G. T. Ault, A. M. Kaiser, A. J. Senagore, Laparoscopic versus open colon resections in California: A cross-sectional analysis. Am. Surg. 78, 1063–1065 (2019).
9. C. Chapron, D. Querleu, M.-A. Bruhat, P. Madelenat, H. Fernandez, F. Pierre, J.-B. Dubuisson, Surgical complications of diagnostic and operative gynaecological laparoscopy: A series of 29,966 cases. Hum. Reprod. 13, 867–872 (2020).
10. C. Tsui, R. Klein, M. Garabrant, Minimally invasive surgery: National trends in adoption and future directions for hospital strategy. Surg. Endosc. 27, 2253–2257 (2019).