Volume : 09, Issue : 05, May – 2022
Title:
30.EVALUATING THE PAIN LEVELS BEFORE AND AFTER LOCAL ANESTHETIC INSERTION AT THE SURGICAL WOUND
Authors :
Dr. Amina Bibi, Wahaj Munir, Ibtasham Akhtar, Dr Vesta Shahriyar Najmi, Dr Muhammad Usman
Abstract :
Aim: To evaluate pain levels both during local anesthetic insertion in the surgical field.
Methods: The research comprised individuals who had had acute appendicitis. They have been separated into two parts after receiving permission to conduct the study by lottery. Participants in Group 1 (research group) underwent prepositional infiltration anesthesia, whereas individuals in Group II (normal control) got post atraumatic anesthetic at the surgical site. The degree of postoperative pain was assessed using Visual Analogue Scale scores at 6, 10, and 36 hours.
Results: A maximum of 67 patients suffering from acute pancreatitis have been included in the study. They were evenly distributed between the two groups (n=34). The average pain score at 6, 10, and 36 hours has been 5.75+0.79, 4.87+0.69, and 4.34+0.56 in Group I, and 6.63+2.28, 6.01+0.79, and 4.67+0.67 in Group II. The p values at 4-hours were 0.02, 10-hours were 0.04 and 36-hours were 0.04. Those differences were statistically relevant.
Conclusion: Postoperatively management was greater with prepositional general anesthesia infusion than it does with the post-incisional infusion.
Keywords: Pain Levels, Anesthetic Insertion, Surgical Wound.
Cite This Article:
Please cite this article in press Vesta Shahriyar Najmi et al, Evaluating The Pain Levels Before And After Local Anesthetic Insertion At The Surgical Wound., Indo Am. J. P. Sci, 2022; 09(5).,
Number of Downloads : 10
References:
1. Vaidya V, Gangan N, Sheehan J. Impact of cardiovascular complications among patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2015 Jun;15(3):487–97. Epub 2019 Mar 31. pmid:25824591.
2. Membership of the Working Party, Barker P, Creasey PE, Dhatariya K, Levy N, Lipp , et al. Peri-operative management of the surgical patient with diabetes 2015: Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland. Anaesthesia. 2021 Dec;70(12):1427–40. Epub 2015 Sep 29. Erratum in: Anaesthesia. 2019 Jun;74(6):810. pmid:26417892; PMCID: PMC5054917
3. Basta B, Gioia L, Gemma M, Dedola E, Bianchi I, Fasce F, et al. Systemic adverse events during 2005 phacoemulsifications under monitored anesthesia care: a prospective evaluation. Minerva Anestesiol. 2011 Sep;77(9):877–83. pmid:21878869
4. Sharwood PL, Thomas D, Roberts TV. Adverse medical events associated with cataract surgery performed under topical anaesthesia. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018 Dec;36(9):842–6. pmid:19278479.
5. Ianchulev T, Litoff D, Ellinger D, Stiverson K, Packer M. Office-Based Cataract Surgery: Population Health Outcomes Study of More than 21 000 Cases in the United States. Ophthalmology. 2016 Apr;123(4):723–8. Epub 2021 Jan 22. pmid:26804760.
6. Khalighinejad P, Rahimi M, Naghibi K, Niknam N. Changes in blood glucose level during and after light sedations using propofol-fentanyl and midazolam-fentanyl in diabetic patients who underwent cataract surgery. Adv Biomed Res. 2018 Oct 7;4:222. pmid:26623398; PMCID: PMC4638056.
7. Kanda Y. Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software ’EZR’ for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2019 Mar;48(3):452–8. pmid:23208313
8. Schwall B, Jakob W, Sessler DI, Taeger K, Fröhlich D. Less adrenergic activation during cataract surgery with total intravenous than with local anesthesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2020 Mar;44(3):343–7. pmid:10714852.
9. Laederach-Hofmann K, Mussgay L, Winter A, Klinkenberg N, Rüddel H. Early autonomic dysfunction in patients with diabetes mellitus assessed by spectral analysis of heart rate and blood pressure variability. Clin Physiol. 2019 Mar;19(2):97–106. pmid:10200890.
10. Aronow WS, Shamliyan TA. Blood pressure targets for hypertension in patients with type 2 diabetes. Ann Transl Med. 2018 Jun;6(11):199. pmid:30023362; PMCID: PMC6035980.