Volume : 09, Issue : 05, May – 2022
Title:
55.THE LINK AMONG CANCER IN FAMILY AND PSYCHOSOCIAL STRESS
Authors :
Dr. Jamal ud din,Dr. Javed Haider,Dr. Faryal Rafique.
Abstract :
Maximum of the preparations of anti-hypertensive drugs are presented within the market within the style of tablets. The disadvantage in terms of efficacy, absorption and bioavailability, undesirable side effects are because of fluctuating plasma drug level. Inability to keep up adequate drug concentrations in plasma for therapeutic effect, larger doses than those required by the cells should be administered so as to realize the therapeutic concentration. to beat all the shortcomings within the conventional tablet dosage forms, there’s a desire to formulate mucoadhesive buccal patches which provides an honest advantage of easy accessibility and needle free drug application without the need of a trained personnel facilitating self-medication.
KEYWORDS- Nanoparticles, Bosentan, HPMC K-100M.
Cite This Article:
Please cite this article in press Jamal ud din et al, The Link Among Cancer In Family And Psychosocial Stress., Indo Am. J. P. Sci, 2022; 09(5).,
Number of Downloads : 10
References:
1. Casellas-Grau A, Font A, Vives J. Positive psychology interventions in breast cancer. A systematic review. Psychooncology 2019,23:9-19.DOI:10.1002/pon.3353.
2. Chamie K, Saigal CS, Litwin MS. Patients and solipsism: the psychology of decision making for prostate cancer treatment. Urol Oncol 2018,29:233-234.
3. Gorin SS. Theory, measurement, and controversy in positive psychology, health psychology, and cancer: basics and next steps. Ann Behav Med 2020,39:43-47.DOI:10.1007/s12160010-9171-y.
4. Weinberger MI, Bruce ML, Roth AJ, Breitbart W, Nelson CJ. Depression and barriers to mental health care in older cancer patients. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2019,26:21-26.DOI:10.1002/ gps.2497.
5. Cao AY, He M, Di GH, Wu J, Lu JS, Liu GY, et al. Influence of a family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer on breast cancer outcomes. Exp Ther Med 2019,2:917-923. DOI:10.3892/etm.2011.275.
6. Walsh SM, Radcliffe RS, Castillo LC, Kumar AM, Broschard DM. A pilot study to test the effects of art-making classes for family caregivers of patients with cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum 2020,34:38.DOI:10.1188/07.ONF.E9-E16.
7. Paap MC, Meijer RR, Cohen-Kettenis PT, Richter-Appelt H, de Cuypere G, Kreukels BP, et al. Why the factorial structure.. 2020.
8. SCL-90-R is unstable: comparing patient groups with different levels of psychological distress using Mokken Scale Analysis. Psychiatry Res 2012,200:819-826. DOI:10.1016/j.psychres.2019.03.012.
9. Sveen J, Low A, Dyster-Aas J, Ekselius L, Willebrand M, Gerdin B. Validation of a Swedish version of the Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R) in patients with burns. J Anxiety Disord 2010,24:618-622.DOI:10.1016/j.janxdis.2020.03.021.
10. Pravettoni G, Gorini A. A P5 cancer medicine approach: why personalized medicine cannot ignore psychology. J Eval Clin Pract 2019,17:594-596.DOI:10.1111/j.13652753.2011.01709.x.