Volume : 09, Issue : 09, September – 2022

Title:

46.REVIEW OF ROLES OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY (MRCP)
‬

Authors :

Mohammed Yahya Mohammed Alamer, Ahmed Mohammed Abbas Awan, Hadiel Mohammad S Ibrahim, Ghadeer J M S Felflan , Suha Musaed S Allihyani, Basmah Ghazi Bakhash , Ghassan Mohammed Hadi Al Alaji, Khalid Binali Ghurmullah Alzahrani

 

Abstract :

Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) is a method that has developed during the last twenty years. It still plays a crucial role in the non-invasive examination of several pancreatico-biliary illnesses. We evaluated the efficacy of MRCP as a noninvasive diagnostic instrument in individuals with various conditions. Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) is a diagnostic technique that is both safe in terms of ionizing radiation exposure and does not require the use of iodinated contrast agents. It effectively visualizes the biliary tree by utilizing a combination of projectional and cross-sectional imaging methods.

Cite This Article:

Please cite this article in Mohammed Yahya Mohammed Alamer et al, Review Of Roles Of Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography (MRCP)., Indo Am. J. P. Sci, 2022; 09(9).

Number of Downloads : 10

References:

1. Martin, D. F., & Laasch, H. U. (2001). The biliary tree. In: (4th ed.). In: Grainger, R. G., Allison, D. J., Adam, A., & Dixon, A. K. (Eds.), Grainger and Allison’s diagnostic radiology 2 (pp. 1292–1293) London: Churchil Livingstone.
2. Schindera, S. T., Miller, C. M., & Ho, L. M., et al. (2007). Magnetic resonance (MR) cholangiography: quantitative and qualitative comparison 3 Tesla with 1.5 Tesla. Invest Radiol 42(6), 399–405.
3. Keogan, M. T., & Edelman, R. R. (2001). Technologic advances in abdominal MR imaging. Radiology 220(2), 310–320.
4. Fulcher, A. S., Turner, M. A., & Franklin, K. J., et al. (2000). Primary sclerosing cholangitis: evaluation with MR cholangiography- a case-control study. Radiology 215(1), 71–80.
5. Sodickson, A., Mortele, K. J., & Barish, M. A., et al. (2006). Three-dimensional fast-recovery fast spin-echo MRCP: comparison with two-dimensional single-shot fast spin echo techniques. Radiology 238(2), 549–559.
6. Saisho, H., & Yamaguchi, T. (2004). Diagnostic imaging for pancreatic cancer: computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and posi- tron emission tomography. Pancreas 28(3), 273–278.
7. Takehara Y, Ichijo K, Tooyama N, et al. Breath-hold MR cholangiopancreatography with a long-echo-train fast spin-echo sequence and a surface coil in chronic pancreatitis. Radiology. 1994;192:73–78.
8. Barish MA, Yucel EK, Soto JA, Chuttani R, Ferrucci JT. MR Cholangiopancreatography: efficacy of three-dimensional turbo spin-echo technique. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995;165:295–300.
9. Fayad LM, Holland GA, Bergin D, et al. Functional magnetic resonance cholangiography (fMRC) of the gallbladder and biliary tree with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiography. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2003;18:449–460.
10. Baillie J, Kimberly J. Prospective comparison of secretin-stimulated MRCP with manometry in the diagnosis of sphincter of Oddi dysfunction types II and III. Gut. 2007;56:742–744.
11. Park MS, Yu JS, Lee JH, Kim KW. Value of manganese-enhanced T1- and T2-weighted MR cholangiography for differentiating cystic parenchymal lesions from cystic abnormalities which communicate with bile ducts. Yonsei Med J. 2007;48:1072–1074.
12. Verma D, Kapadia A, Eisen GM, Adler DG. EUS vs MRCP for detection of choledocholithiasis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;64:248–254.
13. Czako L. Diagnosis of early-stage chronic pancreatitis by secretin-enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. J Gastroenterol. 2007;42:113–117.
14. Pavone P, Laghi A, Panebianco V, Catalano C, Brillo R, Assael F, et al. Diagnosis of diseases of biliary and pancreatic ducts with magnetic resonance cholangio pancreatography (MRCP) Saudi J Gastroenterol. 1998;4:67–75.
15. Al-Dhuhli H. Role of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in the evaluation of biliary disease. Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2009 Dec;9(3):341-52. Epub 2009 Dec 19.
16. O’Regan DP, Fitzgerald J, Allsop J, Gibson D, Larkman DJ, Cokkinos D, et al. A comparison of MR cholangiopancreatography at 1.5 and 3.0 Tesla. Br J Radiol. 2005;78:894–8.
17. Merkle EM, Haugan PA, Thomas J, Jaffe TA, Gullotto C. 3.0- versus 1.5-T MR cholangiography: a pilot study. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;186:516–21.
18. Akisik MF, Sandrasegaran K, Aisen AA, Maglinte DDT, Sherman S, Lehman GA. Dynamic secretinenhanced MR cholangiopancreatography. Radiographics. 2006;26:665–77.
19. Lee NJ, Kim KW, Kim TK, Kim MH, Kim SY, Park MS, et al. Secretin-stimulated MRCP. Abdom Imaging. 2006;31:575–81.
20. Todani T, Watanabe Y, Narusue M, Tabuchi K, Okajima K. Congenital bile duct cysts: classification, operative procedures, and review of thirty-seven cases including cancer arising from choledochal cyst. Am J Surg. 1977;134:263–9.
21. Northover JMA, Terblanche J. Applied surgical anatomy of the biliary tree. Clin Surg Int. 1982;5:1–16.
22. Taourel P, Bret PM, Reinhold C, Barkun AN, Atri M. Anatomic variants of the biliary tree: diagnosis with MR cholangiopancreatography. Radiology. 1996;199:521–7.
23. Deziel DJ, Millikan KW, Economou SG, Doolas A, Ko ST, Airan MC. Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a national survey of 4,292 hospitals and an analysis of 77,604 cases. Am J Surg. 1993;165:9–14.
24. Hall-Craggs M, Allen C, Owens C, Theis BA, Donald JJ, Paley M, et al. MR cholangiography: clinical evaluation in 40 cases. Radiology. 1993;189:423–7.
25. Soto JA, Barish MA, Yucel EK, Siegenberg D, Ferrucci JT, Chuttani R. Magnetic resonance cholangiography: comparison to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Gastroenterology. 1996;110:589–97.
26. Dwerryhouse SJ, Brown E, Vipond MN. Prospective evaluation of magnetic resonance cholangiography to detect common bile duct stones before laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg. 1998;85:1364–6.
27. Aubé C, Delorme B, Yzet T, Burtin P, Lebigot J, Pessaux P, Gondry-Jouet C, Boyer J. MR cholangiopancreatography versus endoscopic sonography in suspected common bile duct lithiasis: a prospective, comparative study. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005;184:55–62.
28. Schmidt S, Chevallier P, Novellas S, Gelsi E, Vanbiervliet G, Tran A, et al. Choledocholithiasis: repetitive thick-slab single-shot projection magnetic resonance cholangiopancreaticography versus endoscopic ultrasonography. Eur Radiol. 2007;17:241–50.
29. Reinhold C, Taourel P, Bret PM, Cortas GA, Mehta SN, Barkun AN, et al. Choledocholithiasis: evaluation of MR cholangiography for diagnosis. Radiology. 1998;209:435–42.
30. Park MS, Yu JS, Kim YH, Kim MJ, Kim JH, Lee S, et al. Acute cholecystitis: comparison of MR cholangiography and US. Radiology. 1998;209:781–5.