Volume : 10, Issue : 01, January – 2023



Authors :

Upendra N, J S Venkatesh, Anju Jayan, Alby Sunny, A S Gayathri Lakshmi,Anandhu R S

Abstract :

A significant hazard to human health is tuberculosis infection, and in the early 21st century, the disease’s prevalence has dramatically increased worldwide. Mycobacterium tuberculosis is the organism that causes tuberculosis, and it uses a number of tactics to thrive in different host lesions. Due to these survival strategies, the infection is immune to currently available medications, which is a significant reason why tuberculosis cannot be effectively controlled. There are numerous medications that can be used in therapeutic settings, and a number of prospective substances are also being screened, produced, or tested in preclinical or clinical research. Effective and long-lasting progress in the creation of anti-tuberculosis medications will primarily depend on an accurate comprehension of the complicated the pathogen’s interactions with the host human. There is a lot of information to support the characteristics of tuberculosis. In this work, we emphasized the difficulties in creating innovative medications with strong bacteriostatic or bactericidal activity that shorten the minimal amount of time needed to treat tuberculosis infection.

Cite This Article:

Please cite this article in press Upendra N et al, Challenges In The Development Of Drugs For The Treatment Of Tuberculosis – A Review., Indo Am. J. P. Sci, 2023; 10 (01).

Number of Downloads : 10


1. Lönnroth K, Jaramillo E, Williams BG, et al. Drivers of tuberculosis epidemics: the role of risk factors and social determinants. Soc Sci Med. 2009;68:2240–6.
2. Global tuberculosis control: a short update to the 2009 report. Geneva, World Health Organization 2009, WHO/HTM/TB/2009.426.
3. Zhang Y, Yew WW. Mechanisms of drug resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2009;13:1320–30.
4. Wright A, Zignol M, Van Deun A, et al. Epidemiology of antituberculosis drug resistance 2002–07: an updated analysis of the Global Project on Anti-Tuberculosis Drug Resistance Surveillance. Lancet. 2009;373:1861–73.
5. Dye C, Williams BG. The population dynamics and control of tuberculosis. Science. 2010;328:856–61.
6. Sharma SK, Mohan A. Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. Indian J Med Res. 2004;120:354–76.
7. Johnson R, Streicher EM, Louw GE, et al. Drug resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Curr Issues Mol Biol. 2006;8:97–111.
8. Slayden RA, Barry CE. The genetics and biochemistry of isoniazid resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Microbes Infect. 2000;2:659–69.
9. Heym B, Saint-Joanis B, Cole ST. The molecular basis of isoniazid resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Tuber Lung Dis. 1999;79:267–71.
10. Zhang Y, Heym B, Allen B, et al. The catalase-peroxidase gene and isoniazid resistance of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Nature. 1992;358:591–3.
11. Barry CE, Lee RE, Mdluli K, et al. Mycolic acids: structure, biosynthesis and physiological functions. Prog Lipid Res. 1998;37:143–79.
12. Winder F. Mode of action of the antimycobacterial agents and associated aspects of the molecular biology of mycobacteria. In: Ratledge C, Stanford J, editors. The biology of mycobacteria, vol. 1. New York: Academic Press; 1982. p. 354–438.
13. Banerjee A, Dubnau E, Quemard A, et al. inhA, a gene encoding a target for isoniazid and ethionamide in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Science. 1994;263:227–30.
14. Zhang Y, Telenti A. Genetics of drug resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. In: Hatful GF, Jacobs Jr WR, editors. Molecular genetics of mycobacteria. Washington DC: ASM Press; 2000. p. 235–54.
15. Ramaswamy S, Musser JM. Molecular genetic basis of antimicrobial agent resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis: 1998 update. Tuber Lung Dis. 1998;79:3–29.
16. Marttila HJ, Soini H, Eerola E. A Ser315Thr substitution in KatG is predominant in genetically heterogeneous multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates originating from the St. Petersburg area in Russia. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1998;42:2443–5.
17. Rouse DA, DeVito JA, Li Z, et al. Site-directed mutagenesis of the katG gene of Mycobacterium tuberculosis: effects on catalase-peroxidase activities and isoniazid resistance. Mol Microbiol. 1996;22:583–92.
18. Telenti A, Imboden P, Marchesi F, et al. Detection of rifampicin-resistance mutations in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Lancet. 1993;341:647–50.
19. Herrera L, Jiménez S, Valverde A, et al. Molecular analysis of rifampicin-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolated in Spain (1996–2001). Description of new mutations in the rpoB gene and review of the literature. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2003;21:403–8.
20. Zhang Y, Wade MM, Scorpio A, et al. Mode of action of pyrazinamide: disruption of Mycobacterium tuberculosis membrane transport and energetics by pyrazinoic acid. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2003;52:790–5.
21. Salfinger M, Crowle AJ, Reller LB. Pyrazinamide and pyrazinoic acid activity against tubercle bacilli in cultured human macrophages and in the BACTEC system. J Infect Dis. 1990;162:201–7.
22. Zhang Y, Scorpio A, Nikaido H, et al. Role of acid pH and deficient efflux of pyrazinoic acid in unique susceptibility of Mycobacterium tuberculosis to pyrazinamide. J Bacteriol. 1999;181:2044–9.
23. Sheen P, Ferrer P, Gilman RH, et al. Effect of pyrazinamidase activity on pyrazinamide resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Tuberculosis (Edinb). 2009;89:109–13.
24. Scorpio A, Zhang Y. Mutations in pncA, a gene encoding pyrazinamidase/nicotinamidase, cause resistance to the antituberculous drug pyrazinamide in tubercle bacillus. Nat Med. 1996;2:662–7.
25. Takayama K, Kilburn JO. Inhibition of synthesis of arabinogalactan by ethambutol in Mycobacterium smegmatis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1989;33:1493–9.
26. Telenti A, Philipp WJ, Sreevatsan S, et al. The emb operon, a gene cluster of Mycobacterium tuberculosis involved in resistance to ethambutol. Nat Med. 1997;3:567–70.
27. Lee HY, Myoung HJ, Bang HE, et al. Mutations in the embB locus among Korean clinical isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis resistant to ethambutol. Yonsei Med J. 2002;43:59–64.
28. Ramaswamy SV, Amin AG, Göksel S, et al. Molecular genetic analysis of nucleotide polymorphisms associated with ethambutol resistance in human isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2000;44:326–36.
29. Van Niekerk C, Ginsberg A. Assessment of global capacity to conduct tuberculosis drug development trials: do we have what it takes? Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2009;13:1367–72.
30. Mitnick C, Bayona J, Palacios E, et al. Community-based therapy for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in Lima, Peru. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:119–28.
31. Ma Z, Lienhardt C, McIlleron H, et al. Global tuberculosis drug development pipeline: the need and the reality. Lancet. 2010;375:2100–9.
32. World Health Organization. The global plan to stop TB 2011–2015: transforming the fight towards elimination of tuberculosis. World Health Organization; 2010.
33. Niemi M, Backman JT, Fromm MF, et al. Pharmacokinetic interactions with rifampicin: clinical relevance. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2003;42:819–50.
34. L’homme RF, Nijland HM, Gras L, et al. Clinical experience with the combined use of lopinavir/ritonavir and rifampicin. AIDS. 2009;23:863–5.
35. Khachi H, O’Connell R, Ladenheim D, et al. Pharmacokinetic interactions between rifabutin and lopinavir/ritonavir in HIV-infected patients with mycobacterial co-infection. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2009;64:871–3.
36. Burman WJ, Gallicano K, Peloquin C. Therapeutic implications of drug interactions in the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus-related tuberculosis. Clin Infect Dis. 1999;28:419–29.
37. Dooley KE, Chaisson RE. Tuberculosis and diabetes mellitus: convergence of two epidemics. Lancet Infect Dis. 2009;9:737–46.
38. Stevenson CR, Critchley JA, Forouhi NG, et al. Diabetes and the risk of tuberculosis: a neglected threat to public health? Chronic Illn. 2007;3:228–45.
39. Lönnroth K, Williams BG, Cegielski P, et al. A consistent log-linear relationship between tuberculosis incidence and body mass index. Int J Epidemiol. 2010;39:149–55.
40. Payne DJ, Gwynn MN, Holmes DJ, et al. Drugs for bad bugs: confronting the challenges of antibacterial discovery. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2007;6:29–40.
41. Pethe K, Sequeira PC, Agarwalla S, et al. A chemical genetic screen in Mycobacterium tuberculosis identifies carbon-source-dependent growth inhibitors devoid of in vivo efficacy. Nat Commun. 2010;1:57.
42. Koul A, Dendouga N, Vergauwen K, et al. Diarylquinolines target subunit c of mycobacterial ATP synthase. Nat Chem Biol. 2007;3:323–4.
43. Makarov V, Manina G, Mikusova K, et al. Benzothiazinones kill Mycobacterium tuberculosis by blocking arabinan synthesis. Science. 2009;324:801–4.
44. Williams KN, Stover CK, Zhu T, et al. Promising antituberculosis activity of the oxazolidinone PNU-100480 relative to that of linezolid in a murine model. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009;53:1314–9.
45. Charest MG, Lerner CD, Brubaker JD, et al. A convergent enantioselective route to structurally diverse 6-deoxytetracycline antibiotics. Science. 2005;308:395–8.
46. Andries K, Verhasselt P, Guillemont J, et al. A diarylquinoline drug active on the ATP synthase of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Science. 2005;307:223–7.
47. Huitric E, Verhasselt P, Andries K, Hoffner SE. In vitro antimycobacterial spectrum of a diarylquinoline ATP synthase inhibitor. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007;51:4202–4.
48. Haagsma AC, Abdillahi-Ibrahim R, Wagner MJ, et al. Selectivity of TMC207 towards mycobacterial ATP synthase compared with that towards the eukaryotic homologue. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009;53:1290–2.
49. Koul A, Vranckx L, Dendouga N, et al. Diarylquinolines are bactericidal for dormant mycobacteria as a result of disturbed ATP homeostasis. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:25273–80.
50. Ibrahim M, Andries K, Lounis N, et al. Synergistic activity of R207910 combined with pyrazinamide against murine tuberculosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007;51:1011–5. 51. Lounis N, Veziris N, Chauffour A, Truffot-Pernot C, Andries K, Jarlier V. Combinations of R207910 with drugs used to treat multidrug-resistant tuberculosis have the potential to shorten treatment duration. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2006;50:3543–7.
52. Keshavjee S, Farmer PE. Tuberculosis, drug resistance, and the history of modern medicine. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:931–6.
53. Global Alliance for TB Drug Development. Evaluation of early bactericidal activity in pulmonary tuberculosis. US National Institutes of Health, ClinicalTrials.gov. http://www.clinicaltrials.gov [ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00944021].
54. Yew WW, Chau CH, Wen KH. Linezolid in the treatment of ‘difficult’ multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2008;12:345–6. b raz j inf e c t di s . 2 0 1 3;17(1):74–81 81
55. Migliori GB, Eker B, Richardson MD, et al. A retrospective TBNET assessment of linezolid safety, tolerability and efficacy in multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. Eur Respir J. 2009;34:387–93.
56. Diacon AH, Dawson R, Hanekom M, et al. The safety, tolerability and early bactericidal activity and pharmacokinetics of PA824 in previously untreated, uncomplicated, sputum smear-positive pulmonary tuberculosis patients. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010;54:3402–7.
57. Williams KN, Brickner SJ, Stover CK, et al. Addition of PNU-100480 to first-line drugs shortens the time needed to cure murine tuberculosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2009;180:371–6.
58. Wallis RS, Jakubiec WM, Kumar V, et al. Biomarker-assisted dose selection for safety and efficacy in early development of PNU-100480 for tuberculosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011;55:567–74.
59. Fischbach MA, Walsh CT. Antibiotics for emerging pathogens. Science. 2009;325:1089–93.
60. Van den Boogaard J, Kibiki GS, Kisanga ER, Boeree MJ, Aarnoutse RE. New drugs against tuberculosis: problems, progress, and evaluation of agents in clinical development. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009;53:849–62.
61. Lienhardt C, Raviglione M, Spigelman M, et al. New drugs for the treatment of tuberculosis: needs, challenges, promise, and prospects for the future. J Infect Dis. 2012;205: S241–9.
62. Tyagi S, Nuermberger E, Yoshimatsu T, et al. Bactericidal activity of the nitroimidazopyran PA-824 in a murine model of tuberculosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2005;49: 2289–93.
63. Lenaerts AJ, Gruppo V, Marietta KS, et al. Preclinical testing of the nitroimidazopyran PA-824 for activity against Mycobacterium tuberculosis in a series of in vitro and in vivo models. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2005;49:2294–301.
64. Ginsberg AM. Drugs in development for tuberculosis. Drugs. 2010;70:2201–14.
65. Nuermberger E, Rosenthal I, Tyagi S, et al. Combination chemotherapy with the nitroimidazopyran PA-824 and first-line drugs in a murine model of tuberculosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2006;50:2621–5.
66. Nuermberger E, Tyagi S, Tasneen R, et al. Powerful bactericidal and sterilizing activity of a regimen containing PA-824, moxifloxacin, and pyrazinamide in a murine model of tuberculosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2008;52:1522–4.
67. Diacon AH, Dawson R, Hanekom M, et al. Early bactericidal activity and pharmacokinetics of PA-824 in smear-positive tuberculosis patients. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010;54:3402–7.
68. Collin F, Karkare S, Maxwell A. Exploiting bacterial DNA gyrase as a drug target: current state and perspectives. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011;92:479–97.
69. Rustomjee R, Lienhardt C, Kanyok T, et al. A phase II study of the sterilising activities of ofloxacin, gatifloxacin and moxifloxacin in pulmonary tuberculosis. Int J Tuberc LungDis. 2008;12:128–38.
70. Rodríguez JC, Ruiz M, López M, et al. In vitro activity of moxifloxacin, levofloxacin, gatifloxacin and linezolid against Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2002;20:464–7.
71. Cynamon M, Sklaney MR. Gatifloxacin and ethionamide as the foundation for therapy of tuberculosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2003;47:2442–4.
72. Johnson JL, Hadad DJ, Boom WH, et al. Early and extended early bactericidal activity of levofloxacin, gatifloxacin and moxifloxacin in pulmonary tuberculosis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2006;10:605–12.
73. Park-Wyllie LY, Juurlink DN, Kopp A, et al. Outpatient gatifloxacin therapy and dysglycemia in older adults. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:1352–61.
74. Gavin III JR, Kubin R, Choudhri S, et al. Moxifloxacin and glucose homeostasis: a pooled-analysis of the evidence from clinical and postmarketing studies. Drug Saf. 2004;27:671–86.
75. Hooper DC, Rubinstein 3rd E, editors. Quinolone antimicrobial agents. 3rd ed. Washington, DC: ASM Press; 2003.
76. Weiner M, Burman W, Luo CC, et al. Effects of rifampin and multidrug resistance gene polymorphism on concentrations of moxifloxacin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007;51:2861–71.
77. Nijland HM, Ruslami R, Suroto AJ, et al. Rifampicin reduces plasma concentrations of moxifloxacin in patients with tuberculosis. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;45:1001–7.
78. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/1997/who tb 96. 210 (rev.1).pdf