Volume : 11, Issue : 12, December – 2024

Title:

THE ROLE OF TECHNOLOGY IN IMPROVING PATIENT OUTCOMES IN PREHOSPITAL EMERGENCY CARE: A REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE

Authors :

Nawaf Mousa Ali Mahzari, Abdulmajeed Ali Saeed AlGhamdi, Saleh Mohammed Hadi Al Safiyah, ‏Khalid Nasser Alanzan, ‏Abdulmajeed Ali Hassan Majrashi, Rashed Mohammad Rashed Alkaraan, Adel Yahya Salem Alfaifi, Hamad Abdullah Z Al Muaddi, Abdullah Nasser Shallaa, Ali Mousa Al Ramadhan

Abstract :

This systematic review investigates the pivotal role of technology in enhancing patient outcomes in prehospital emergency care, with a particular focus on low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) such as Rwanda. Emergency medical services (EMS) face significant challenges, including inefficient communication systems, inadequate triage processes, and difficulties in locating emergencies, which hinder timely and effective care. This review emphasizes the potential of integrating information technology and mobile health (mHealth) solutions to address these challenges and improve EMS operations. Various technological interventions, including telemedicine, mobile applications, point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS), and advanced medical monitoring devices, are critically analyzed for their impact on patient assessment, decision-making, and overall quality of care. Furthermore, the review highlights existing gaps in the literature, particularly regarding the practical implementation of these technologies in diverse EMS settings. By identifying these gaps, the review advocates for further research to optimize the integration of technology into emergency medical services, thereby improving patient outcomes and enhancing the overall effectiveness of prehospital care.
Keywords: Technology, Prehospital Emergency Care, Patient Outcomes, Mobile Health, Emergency Medical Services.

Cite This Article:

Please cite this article in press Nawaf Mousa Ali Mahzari et al., The Role Of Technology In Improving Patient Outcomes In Prehospital Emergency Care: A Review Of The Literature.,Indo Am. J. P. Sci, 2024; 11 (12).

Number of Downloads : 10

References:

1. Becker, T. K., Martin-Gill, C., Callaway, C. W., et al. (2018). Feasibility of paramedic performed prehospital lung ultrasound in medical patients with respiratory distress. Prehospital Emergency Care, 22(2), 175–179.
2. Becker, T. K., Tafoya, C. A., Osei-Ampofo, M., et al. (2017). Cardiopulmonary ultrasound for critically ill adults improves diagnostic accuracy in a resource-limited setting: The AFRICA trial. Tropical Medicine & International Health, 22(12), 1599–1608.
3. Bond, W. F., Lammers, R. L., Spillane, L. L., et al. (2007). The use of simulation in emergency medicine: A research agenda. Academic Emergency Medicine, 14(4), 353–363.
4. Chakravarthy, B., Ter Haar, E., Bhat, S. S., McCoy, C. E., Denmark, T. K., & Lotfipour, S. (2011). Simulation in medical school education: Review for emergency medicine. Western Journal of Emergency Medicine, 12(4), 461–466.
5. Christensen, E. F., Larsen, T. M., Jensen, F. B., et al. (2016). Diagnosis and mortality in prehospital emergency patients transported to hospital: A population-based and registry-based cohort study. BMJ Open, 6, e011558
6. Cook, D. A., Hatala, R., Brydges, R., et al. (2011). Technology-enhanced simulation for health professions education: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA, 306(9), 978–988.
7. Feng, M., McSparron, J. I., Kien, D. T., et al. (2018). Transthoracic echocardiography and mortality in sepsis: Analysis of the MIMIC-III database. Intensive Care Medicine, 44(6), 884–892.
8. Fernandez, R., Wang, E., Vozenilek, J. A., et al. (2010). Simulation center accreditation and programmatic benchmarks: A review for emergency medicine. Academic Emergency Medicine, 17(10), 1093–1103.
9. Fritz, P. Z., Gray, T., & Flanagan, B. (2008). Review of mannequin-based high-fidelity simulation in emergency medicine. Emergency Medicine Australasia, 20(1), 1–9.
10. Gordon, J. A., & Vozenilek, J. A. (2008). 2008 Academic Emergency Medicine Consensus Conference. Academic Emergency Medicine, 15(10), 971–977.
11. Heitz, C., Eyck, R. T., Smith, M., & Fitch, M. (2011). Simulation in medical student education: Survey of clerkship directors in emergency medicine. Western Journal of Emergency Medicine, 12(4), 455–460.
12. Issenberg, S. B., McGaghie, W. C., Petrusa, E. R., Lee Gordon, D., & Scalese, R. J. (2005). Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: A BEME systematic review. Medical Teacher, 27(10), 10–28.
13. Kendall, J. L., Hoffenberg, S. R., & Smith, R. S. (2007). History of emergency and critical care ultrasound: The evolution of a new imaging paradigm. Critical Care Medicine, 35(5 Suppl.), S126–S130
14. Ketelaars, R., Reijnders, G., van Geffen, G. J., et al. (2018). ABCDE of prehospital ultrasonography: A narrative review. Critical Ultrasound Journal, 10, 17.
15. Lichtenstein, D. A., & Mezière, G. A. (2008). Relevance of lung ultrasound in the diagnosis of acute respiratory failure: The BLUE protocol. Chest, 134(1), 117–125.
16. Mathews, B. K., Miller, P. E., & Olson, A. P. J. (2018). Point-of-care ultrasound improves shared diagnostic understanding between patients and providers. South Medical Journal, 111(7), 395–400.
17. McFetrich, J. (2006). A structured literature review on the use of high fidelity patient simulators for teaching in emergency medicine. Emergency Medicine Journal, 23(6), 509–511.
18. McGaghie, W. C., Issenberg, S. B., Cohen, E. R., Barsuk, J. H., & Wayne, D. B. (2011). Does simulation-based medical education with deliberate practice yield better results than traditional clinical education? A meta-analytic comparative review of the evidence. Academic Medicine, 86(6), 706–711.
19. Okuda, Y., Bond, W., Bonfante, G., et al. (2008). National growth in simulation training within emergency medicine residency programs, 2003-2008. Academic Emergency Medicine, 15(12), 1113–1116.
20. Perera, P., Mailhot, T., Riley, D., et al. (2010). The RUSH exam: Rapid ultrasound in SHock in the evaluation of the critically ill. Emergency Medicine Clinics of North America, 28(1), 29–56, vii.
21. Pontet, J., Yic, C., Diaz-Gomez, J. L., et al. (2019). Impact of an ultrasound-driven diagnostic protocol at early intensive-care stay: A randomized-controlled trial. Ultrasound Journal, 11, 24.
22. Smallwood, N., & Dachsel, M. (2018). Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS): Unnecessary gadgetry or evidence-based medicine? Clinical Medicine (London), 18, 219–224.
23. Ziv, A., Wolpe, P. R., Small, S. D., & Glick, S. (2003). Simulation-based medical education: An ethical imperative. Academic Medicine, 78(8), 783–788.