Please cite this article in press J.Gopala Krishna et al., Applications Of Quantitative Structure Activity Relationship(QSAR)In Assessing Aquatic Toxicity,, Indo Am. J. P. Sci, 2024; 11 (03).

1. Alengebawy, A., Abdelkhalek, S.T., Qureshi, S.R. and Wang, M.Q., 2021. Heavy metals and pesticides toxicity in agricultural soil and plants: Ecological risks and human health implications. Toxics, 9(3), p.42.
2. Kar, S., Roy, K. and Leszczynski, J., 2018. Impact of pharmaceuticals on the environment risk assessment using QSAR modeling approach. Computational Toxicology: Methods and Protocols, pp.395-443.
3. Khan, K., Benfenati, E. and Roy, K., 2019. Consensus QSAR modeling of toxicity of pharmaceuticals to different aquatic organisms: ranking and prioritization of the DrugBank database compounds. Ecotoxicology and environmental safety, 168, pp.287- 297.
4. Roy, K. and Mitra, I., 2011. On various metrics used for validation of predictive QSAR models with applications in virtual screening and focused library design. Combinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening, 14(6), pp.450.
5. Rand, G.M. and Petrocelli, S.R., 1985. Fundamentals of aquatic toxicology: methods and applications. FMC Corp., Princeton, NJ.
6. Kwok, K.W., Leung, K.M., Bao, V.W. and Lee, J.S., 2008. Copper toxicity in the marine copepod Tigropus japonicus: Low variability and high reproducibility of repeated acute and life-cycle tests. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 57(6-12), pp.632-636
7. Edition, F., 2002. Methods for Measuring the Acute Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater and Marine Organisms.
8. toxicology, 11(1), pp.5-12.
9. Craig, R.K., 2022. There Is More to the Clean Water Act than Waters of the United States: A Holistic Jurisdictional Approach to the Section 402 and Section 404 Permit
10. Programs. Case Western Reserve Law Review (Forthcoming), USC CLASS Research Paper No. CLASS22-15, USC Law Legal Studies Paper, (22-15).
11. McKim, J.M., Bradbury, S.P. and Niemi, G.J., 1987. Fish acute toxicity syndromes and their use in the QSAR approach to hazard assessment. Environmental Health Perspectives, 71, pp.171-186.
12. Nendza, M.O.N.I.K.A., Volmer, J.O.H.A.N.N.E.S., Klein, W.E.R.N.E.R., Kalcher, N. and Devillers, J., 1990. Risk assessment based on QSAR estimates. Practical Applications of Quantitative Structure–Activity Relationships (QSAR) in Environmental Chemistry and Toxicology, pp.213-240.
13. Sauvant, M.P., Pepin, D., Bohatier, J., Groliere, C.A. and Guillot, J., 1997. Toxicity assessment of 16 inorganic environmental pollutants by six bioassays. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 37(2), pp.131-140.
14. Luo, S., Wei, Z., Spinney, R., Villamena, F.A., Dionysiou, D.D., Chen, D., Tang, C.J., Chai, L. and Xiao, R., 2018. Quantitative structure–activity relationships for reactivities of sulfate and hydroxyl radicals with aromatic contaminants through single–electron transfer pathway. Journal of hazardous materials, 344, pp.1165-1173.
15. Kay, J.J., 2003. On complexity theory, exergy, and industrial ecology: some implications for construction ecology. In Construction ecology (pp. 96-131). Routledge.
16. Graedel, T.E., 1996. On the concept of industrial ecology. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment, 21(1), pp.69-98.
17. Kostal, J., Voutchkova-Kostal, A., Anastas, P.T. and Zimmerman, J.B., 2015. Identifying and designing chemicals with minimal acute aquatic toxicity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(20), pp.6289-6294.
18. Senge, P.M., Carstedt, G. and Porter, P.L., 2001. Next industrial revolution. MIT Sloan management review, 42(2), pp.24-38.
19. Loorbach, D., Rotmans, J. and Kemp, R., 2016. Complexity and transition management. In Complexity and planning (pp. 177-198). Routledge.
20. Khan, K., Benfenati, E. and Roy, K., 2019. Consensus QSAR modeling of toxicity of pharmaceuticals to different aquatic organisms: ranking and prioritization of the DrugBank database compounds. Ecotoxicology and environmental safety, 168, pp.287- 297.
21. Gramatica, P., Cassani, S. and Sangion, A., 2016. Aquatic ecotoxicity of personal care products: QSAR models and ranking for prioritization and safer alternatives’ design. Green Chemistry, 18(16), pp.4393-4406.
22. Casalegno, M., Sello, G. and Benfenati, E., 2006. Top-priority fragment QSAR approach in predicting pesticide aquatic toxicity. Chemical research in toxicology, 19(11), pp.1533-1539.
23. Tebby, C., Mombelli, E., Pandard, P. and Péry, A.R., 2011. Exploring an ecotoxicity database with the OECD (Q) SAR Toolbox and DRAGON descriptors in order to prioritise testing on algae, daphnids, and fish. Science of the total environment, 409(18), pp.3334-3343.
24. Sangion, A. and Gramatica, P., 2016. Hazard of pharmaceuticals for aquatic environment: prioritization by structural approaches and prediction of ecotoxicity. Environment International, 95, pp.131-143.
25. Gramatica, P., Papa, E. and Sangion, A., 2018. QSAR modeling of cumulative environmental end-points for the prioritization of hazardous chemicals. Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts, 20(1), pp.38-47.
26. Hoover, G., Kar, S., Guffey, S., Leszczynski, J. and Sepúlveda, M.S., 2019. In vitro and in silico modeling of perfluoroalkyl substances mixture toxicity in an amphibian fibroblast cell line. Chemosphere, 233, pp.25-33.
27. Lin, Z., Zhong, P., Yin, K., Wang, L. and Yu, H., 2003. Quantification of joint effect for hydrogen bond and development of QSARs for predicting mixture toxicity. Chemosphere, 52(7), pp.1199-1208.
28. Chatterjee, M. and Roy, K., 2021. Prediction of aquatic toxicity of chemical mixtures by the QSAR approach using 2D structural descriptors. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 408, p.124936.
29. Russom, C.L., Anderson, E.B., Greenwood, B.E. and Pilli, A., 1991. ASTER: an integration of the AQUIRE data base and the QSAR system for use in ecological risk assessments. Science of the total environment, 109, pp.667-670.
30. Brockmeier, E.K., Basili, D., Herbert, J., Rendal, C., Boakes, L., Grauslys, A., Taylor, N.S., Danby, E.B., Gutsell, S., Kanda, R. and Cronin, M., 2022. Data-driven learning of narcosis mode of action identifies a CNS transcriptional signature shared between whole organism Caenorhabditis elegans and a fish gill cell line. Science of the Total Environment, 849, p.157666.
31. unkel, J., Mayo, K., Austin, C., Hickerson, A. and Howard, P., 2005. Practical considerations on the use of predictive models for regulatory purposes. Environmental science & technology, 39(7), pp.2188-2199.
32. Muratov, E.N., Bajorath, J., Sheridan, R.P., Tetko, I.V., Filimonov, D., Poroikov, V., Oprea, T.I., Baskin, I.I., Varnek, A., Roitberg, A. and Isayev, O., 2020. QSAR without borders. Chemical Society Reviews, 49(11), pp.3525-3564.
33. Toropova, A.P., Toropov, A.A., Veselinović, A.M., Veselinović, J.B., Leszczynska, D. and Leszczynski, J., 2016. Monte Carlo–based quantitative structure–activity relationship models for toxicity of organic chemicals to Daphnia magna. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 35(11), pp.2691-2697
34. Adams, W., Blust, R., Dwyer, R., Mount, D., Nordheim, E., Rodriguez, P.H. and Spry, D., 2020. Bioavailability assessment of metals in freshwater environments: A historical review. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 39(1), pp.48-59.
35. Balistrieri, L.S., Mebane, C.A., Schmidt, T.S. and Keller, W., 2015. Expanding metal mixture toxicity models to natural stream and lake invertebrate communities. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 34(4), pp.761-776.
36. Câmara, J.S., Montesdeoca-Esponda, S., Freitas, J., Guedes-Alonso, R., Sosa-Ferrera,
Z. and Perestrelo, R., 2021. Emerging contaminants in seafront zones. Environmental impact and analytical approaches. Separations, 8(7), p.95.
37. Geissen, V., Mol, H., Klumpp, E., Umlauf, G., Nadal, M., van der Ploeg, M., van de Zee, S.E. and Ritsema, C.J., 2015. Emerging pollutants in the environment: a challenge for water resource management. International soil and water conservation research, 3(1), pp.57-65.