Volume : 11, Issue : 03, March – 2024
Title:
DIGESTIVE SYSTEM- A REVIEW ARTICLE
Authors :
Shaik.Mubeena Banu, B. Akhila
Abstract :
The digestive system is well adapted for ingesting food breaking it down both mechanically and enzymatic and the absorbing the breakdown products and transporting them to the liver form .separate processes are involved in digesting carbohydrate ,proteins, lipids. The digestive system is well adapted for ingesting food, breaking it down, both mechanically and enzyme and then absorbing the breakdown products and transporting them to the liver. Separate processes are involved in digesting carbohydrates, proteins, and lipids. Many aspects of the digestive process are regulated by neural (autonomic) and local hormonal influences. The structure of the gastric mucosa is well designed to both produce and protect itself from the low pH generated by the secreted hydrochloric acid. The exocrine pancreas produces digestive enzymes in an inactive form. Activation usually occurs within the lumen of the small intestine. The liver receives the bulk of the absorbed nutrients via the portal vein and then uses them for the synthesis of many larger molecules. It includes many more cells than the number present in the human body. These microbes have evolved symbiotically along with the digestive system.
Cite This Article:
Please cite this article in press B. Akhila et al., Digestive System- A Review Article,, Indo Am. J. P. Sci, 2024; 11 (03).
Number of Downloads : 10
References:
1. AbbeeleVan Den P., Enemas K., WieleVan T.De, Verstraete W., Possemiers S. Different human gut models reveal the distinct fermentation patterns of Arabinoxylan versus insulin. J Agric Food Chem. 2013 doo: 10.1021/jf4021784. [Pub Med] [Crosse] [Google Scholar]
2. Aguayo-mendoza M.G., Kite E.C., Linden E. Van Dee, Forde C.G., Piqueras-fiszman B., Steiner M. Oral processing behavior of drinkable , spoonable and chewable foods is primarily determined by rheological and mechanical food properties. Food Qual. Prefer. 2019;71:87–95.due: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2018.06.006. June 2018. [Crossers] [Google Scholar]
3. Armiger M., Aura A.M., Bohn T., Deform C., El S.N., Gomes A. In vitro models for studying secondary plant metabolite digestion and inaccessibility. Compo. Rev. Food Sci. Food Safe. 2014;13(4):413–436. due: 10.1111/1541-4337.12081. [Palmed] [Crossruff] [Google Scholar]
4. Barrios E., Ceuta C., Pelage C., Martínez-Cuesta M.C., Requiem T. Development of human colonic macrobiotic in the computer-controlled dynamic Simulators of the Gastrointestinal tract SIMGI. LWT – Food Sci. Technol. (Lebensmittel-Wissenschaft -Technol.) 2015;61(2):283–289. due: 10.1016/j.lwt.2014.12.014. [Crossruff] [Google Scholar]
5. Bellmen S., Relieved J., Gorses T., Minibus M., Heavenward R. Development of an advanced in vitro model of the stomach and its evaluation versus human gastric physiology. FRIN. 2016;88:191–198. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2016.01.030. [Crosser] [Google Scholar]
6. Bellman S., Krishnan S., de Graf A., de Lit R.A., Postman W.J., Minibus M., Heavenward R. Appetite ratings of foods are predictable with an in vitro advanced gastrointestinal model in combination with an in silicon artificial neural network. Food Res. Int. 2019; 122:77–86. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2019.03.051. [Pub Med] [Crosser] [Google Scholar]
7. Bender L., Harding D., Kennedy D., Lee G., Stokes&Taylor J.B., editors. THE FACTS ON FILE ILLUSTRATED GUIDE TO THE HUMAN BODY: DIGESTIVE SYSTEM. Facts on File, Inc; New York: 2005. [Google Scholar]
8. Blanquet-Diot S., Denis S., Chalancon S., Chairs F., Car dot J.M., Agric M. Use of artificial digestive systems to investigate the biopharmaceutical factors influencing the survival of robotic yeast during gastrointestinal transit in humans. Pharmaceutics. Res. 2012; 29(6):1444–1453. doi: 10.1007/s11095-011-0620-5. [Pub Med] [Crossruff] [Google Scholar]
9. Bohn T., Carrier F., Day L., Delayer A., Egger L., Frites D. Correlation between in vitro and in vivo data on food digestion. What can we predict with static in vitro digestion models? Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nuts. 2018;58(13):2239–2261. doe: 10.1080/10408398.2017.1315362. [Pub Med][Crossruff] [Google Scholar]
10. Boland M., Golding M., Singh H., editors. Food Structures, Digestion and Health. Elsevier Inc; New York: 2014. [Crossruff] [Google Scholar]
11. Bornhorst G.M. Gastric mixing during food digestion : mechanisms and applications. Annul. Rev. Food Sci. Technol. 2017;8(1):523–542. do: 10.1146/annurev-food-030216-025802. [Pub Med] [Crossbred] [Google Scholar]
12. Born horst G.M. Gastric mixing during food Digestion : mechanisms and applications. Annul. Rev. Food Sci. 2017;8(1):523–542. due: 10.1146/annurev-food-030216-025802. [Palmed] [Crossers] [Google Scholar]
13. Born horst G.M., Ferula M.J., Rutherford S.M., Headman D.R., Singh R.P. Rheological properties and textural attributes of cooked Brown and white rice during gastric digestion in vivo. Food Biophysics. 2013;8(2):137–150. due: 10.1007/s11483-013-9288-1. [Crossers] [Google Scholar]
14. Bornhorst G.M., Ferula M.J., Singh R.P. A proposed food breakdown classification system to predict food behavior during gastric digestion. J. Food Sci. 2015;80(5):R924–R934.doo: 10.1111/1750-3841.12846. [Palmed] [Crossruff] [Google Scholar]
15. Born horst G.M., Guest O., Wickham M.S.J., Bialys S. Eng. Digest: Multistate Processes of Food Digestion. 2016;81(3):534–543. doo: 10.1111/1750-3841.13216. [Plumbed] [Crosse] [Google Scholar]
16. Bornhorst G.M., Paul Singh R. Gastric digestion in vivo and in vitro: how the structural aspects of food influence the digestion process. Annul. Rev. Food Sci. Technol. 2014;5:111–132.doe: 10.1146/annurev-food-030713-092346. [Plumbed] [Crosser] [Google Scholar]