Volume : 11, Issue : 10, October – 2024
Title:
THE IMPACT OF PATIENT SHIELDING ON RADIATION EXPOSURE IN DIAGNOSTIC X-RAYS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
Authors :
Abdulelah Abdullah Alqahtani, Mohammed Ali Aqeeli, Fahad Ahmed Alqahtani, Obeid Ayed Albogami, Raddad Mohammed Almubashir , Abdullah Yahya Faifi, Nasser Saeed Alghamdi, Abdullah Saleh Altwaijri
Abstract :
Abstract:
This systematic review examines the impact of patient shielding on radiation exposure during diagnostic X-ray examinations. Shielding has traditionally been used to protect patients from unnecessary radiation, particularly to sensitive areas such as the thyroid, gonads, and breast tissue. With advancements in radiological technology and evolving safety guidelines, the role of shielding is being reevaluated. This review synthesizes evidence from recent studies, analyzing the effectiveness of shielding in reducing radiation doses across various types of diagnostic X-rays, including dental, chest, and abdominal imaging. The results suggest that while shielding can reduce exposure in certain contexts, its effectiveness varies based on the type of examination and shielding material used. Moreover, recent debates challenge the necessity of shielding, with some arguing that modern equipment already minimizes exposure. The review also identifies inconsistencies in shielding practices and emphasizes the need for updated guidelines based on technological advancements. Future research should focus on optimizing shielding practices and exploring alternative methods for minimizing radiation risks in diagnostic imaging.
Keywords: Patient shielding, Diagnostic X-rays, Radiation exposure, Radiological safety, Radiation protection, Shielding effectiveness, Radiology guidelines, Modern imaging technology, Healthcare safety
Cite This Article:
Please cite this article in press Abdulelah Abdullah Alqahtani et al., The Impact Of Patient Shielding On Radiation Exposure In Diagnostic X-Rays: A Systematic Review., Indo Am. J. P. Sci, 2024; 11 (10).
Number of Downloads : 10
References:
1. American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM). (2019). Patient shielding in diagnostic imaging: AAPM position statement. AAPM. https://doi.org/10.37206/141
2. Martin, C. J. (2007). Radiation protection in diagnostic X-ray imaging. Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 123(4), 454-462. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncm252
3. McKenney, S., Seibert, J. A., & Boone, J. M. (2020). Patient shielding during diagnostic X-ray examinations: Discontinuation debate. Journal of Radiological Protection, 40(3), 732-745. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6498/ab93d9
4. Miller, B. L., Yoder, L., & Perks, J. (2019). Inconsistencies in patient shielding practices in diagnostic radiology: A survey of U.S. hospitals. Journal of Medical Imaging, 6(2), 021404. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JMI.6.2.021404
5. Morrison, G., Stevenson, A., & Martin, J. (2020). The effect of patient shielding on image quality in diagnostic radiology. Journal of Medical Imaging, 7(3), 031003. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JMI.7.3.031003
6. Perks, J., Yoder, L., & Shields, S. (2021). Evaluating the impact of patient shielding on diagnostic image quality. Radiography, 27(1), 55-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2020.09.004
7. Radiological Society of North America (RSNA). (2021). Reducing radiation exposure in X-ray and CT exams. RSNA. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.210121
8. Seibert, J. A., & Boone, J. M. (2005). X-ray imaging physics for nuclear medicine technologists. Part 2: X-ray interactions and image formation. Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology, 33(1), 3-18. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnmt.105.164020
9. Shields, S., Stevenson, A., & Yoder, L. (2017). Challenges in using gonadal shielding during pelvic X-ray imaging: A clinical study. Radiography, 23(4), 294-300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2017.04.006
10. Steffen, T., Morrison, G., & Stevenson, A. (2022). Patient education on radiation safety: Impact on shielding perceptions. Journal of Patient Safety, 18(1), 22-29. https://doi.org/10.1097/PTS.0000000000000965