Volume : 12, Issue : 10, October – 2025

Title:

FORMULATION DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION OF MUCOADHESIVE BUCCAL TABLETS OF NARATRIPTAN

Authors :

Shireen Fatima, Dr. Abdul Sayeed, Dr. Syed Areefulla Hussainy, Dr. Faizan Sayeed

Abstract :

The present study was aimed at the formulation development and evaluation of mucoadhesive buccal tablets of Naratriptan to enhance its bioavailability and therapeutic efficacy in the treatment of migraine. Naratriptan undergoes extensive first-pass metabolism, resulting in reduced oral bioavailability; hence, buccal delivery was chosen as an alternative route to bypass hepatic metabolism and provide sustained drug release. Mucoadhesive buccal tablets were prepared using various natural and synthetic polymers such as Sodium starch glycolate, Crospovidone and Croscarmellose sodium by direct compression method.
The formulations were evaluated for pre-compression parameters (bulk density, tapped density, angle of repose) and post-compression parameters (hardness, thickness, friability, drug content, surface pH, swelling index, mucoadhesive strength, and in vitro drug release). All evaluation parameters were found within the acceptable limits. Among the developed formulations, F4 was identified as the optimized formulation, showing a maximum drug release of 99.72 % over 8 hours along with excellent mucoadhesive properties and sustained release profile.
The results of this study indicate that mucoadhesive buccal tablets of Naratriptan offer a promising approach for improving bioavailability and achieving prolonged therapeutic effect in migraine therapy.
Keywords: Naratriptan , Sodium starch glycolate, Crospovidone and Croscarmellose

Cite This Article:

Please cite this article in press Shireen Fatima et al., Formulation Development And Evaluation Of Mucoadhesive Buccal Tablets Of Naratriptan, Indo Am. J. P. Sci, 2025; 12(10).

REFERENCES:

1. V. T. Iswariya and A. Hari Om Prakash Rao. Buccal Tablets A Comprehensive Review. ejpmr, 2016,3(8), 252-262.
2. S.K.Gupta et al; Buccal adhesive drug delivery system: A review; Asian Journal Of Biochemical and pharmaceutical research, 2011;1(2): 105-114.
3. Reena Sheoran. Buccal Drug Delivery System: A Review. Int. J. Pharm. Sci. Rev. Res., 50(1), May – June 2018; Article No. 07, Pages: 40-46.
4. Wertz, P.W. and Squier, C.A., Cellular and molecular basis of barrier function in oral epithelium, Crit. Rev. Ther. Drug Carr. Sys, 8, 1991, 237-269.
5. Squier, C.A., Cox, P., and Wertz, P.W., Lipid content and water permeability of skin and oral mucosa, The J. Invest. Dermat, 96, 1991, 123-126.
6. Squier, C.A. and Wertz, P.W. Structure and function of the oral mucosa and implications for drug delivery, in eds. M.J. Rathbone, Oral Mucosal Drug Delivery, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, New York, 1996, 1-26.
7. Galey, W.R., Lonsdale, H.K., and Nacht, S., The in vitro permeability of skin and buccal mucosa to selected drugs and J Pharm Pharmaceut Sci (www.ualberta.ca/~csps) 1 (1), 1998, 15-30.
8. Gandhi, R.B. and Robinson, J.R., Oral cavity as a site for bioadhesive drug delivery, Adv. Drug Del. Rev., 13, 1994, 43-74.
9. Peppas, N.A. and Buri, P.A., Surface, interfacial and molecular aspects of polymer bioadhesion on soft tissues, J.Control. Rel., 2, 1985, 257-275.
10. Duchene D, Touchard F and Peppas N A Pharmaceutical and medical aspects of Bioadhesive system for drug administration. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm.; 14, 1998, 283-381.
11. Parth S. Patel ,Ashish M. Parmar, Nilang S. Doshi, Hardik V. Patel, Raxit R. Patel, Chetan Nayee. Buccal Drug Delivery System: A Review.
12. Webster’s Encyclopedic Unabridged Dictionary of the English Language. Thunder Bay Press, Avenel (NJ, USA), 2001.
13. Kaelbe D H and Moacanin J. A surface energy analysis of bioadhesion. Polym.; 18: 475-481, 1977.
14. Gu J M, Robinson J R and Leung S. binding of acrylic polymers to mucin/epithelial surfaces; Structure property-relationship. Crit. Rev. Ther. Drug Car. Sys.; 5, 21-67, 1998.
15. Duchene D, Touchard F and Peppas N A. Pharmaceutical and medical aspects of Bio adhesive system for drug administration. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm.; 14, 283-381, 1998.
16. Hollingsbee D A and Timmins P. Topical adhesive system, in Bioadhesion Possibilities and Future Trends, Gurny R and Junginger H E Eds., Wissenchaftliche Verlag Gesellschaft, Stuttgart; 140-164, 1990.
17. R. Jagadeeshwar Reddy, Maimuna Anjum and Mohammed Asif Hussain. A Comprehensive Review on Buccal Drug Delivery System. AJADD [1][3][2013]300-312.
18. Wise Donald L, Handbook of Pharmaceutical controlled release technology: 255-265.
19. Magi. L. et. al., (1994), S.T.P. Pharma Sciences, 4(5), 343.
20. Jimenez-Castellannos MR. Zia. H., Rhodes CT., (1993), Drug Dev. Ind Phar., 19(142), 143.
21. www.controlled drugdelivery.com.
22. AP Gandhi; KR Patel; MR Patel; NM Patel. Int. J. Pharm. Res. Dev., 2011, 3(5), 159-173.
23. R Venkatalakshmi; S Yajaman; M Chetty; C Sasikala; M Varma. Int. J. Pharm. Sci. Res. 2012, 3(1), 35-41.
24. N Sharma; S Jain; S Sardana. J. Adv. Pharm. Edu. Res., 2013, 3(1), 1-15.
25. SK Gupta; IJ Singhavi; M Shirsat; G Karwani; A Agrawal; A Agrawal. Asian J. Biochem. Pharm. Res., 2011,2(1), 105-114.
26. GA Khairnar; FJ Sayyad. Int. J. Pharm. Tech. Res., 2010, 2(1), 719-735.
27. V Prajapati; M Bansal; PK Sharma. Int. J. Pharm. Tech. Res., 2012, 4(2), 582-589.
28. Gandhi SD, Pandya PR, Umbarkar R, Tambawala T and Shah MA. Mucoadhesive drug delivery system- an unusual maneuver for site specific drug delivery system, Inter. J. Pharm. Sci., 2011, 851- 872.
29. Patil SB, Murthy RSR, Mahajan HS, Wagh RD and Gattani SG. Mucoadhesive polymers: means of improving drug delivery, Pharm. Times, 2006, 38 (4), 25-28.
30. Shojaei Amir H, Buccal Mucosa as A Route for Systemic Drug Delivery: A Review; J Pharm Pharmaceut Sci (www.ualberta.ca/~csps) 1998;1 (1):15-3.
31. Horstedt P, Danielsson A, Nyhlin H, Stenling R and Suhr O. Adhesion of bacteria to the human small intestinal mucosa. Scandinavian J. Gastroenterology; 24, 877-885, 1989.
32. Peppas N A and Buri P A. Surface, interfacial and molecular aspects of polymer bioadhesion on soft tissues. J. Control. Release; 2, 257-275, 1985.
33. Woodley J. Bioadhesion: New Possibilities for Drug Administration. Clin. Pharmacokinetic.; 40(2), 77-84, 2001.
34. Harding SE, Davis SS, Deacon MP and Fiebrig I. Biopolymer mucoadhesive. Biotechnology. Genet. Eng. Rev.; 16, 41-86, 1999.
35. Keutscher A H, Zegarelli E V, Beube F E, Chiton N W. A new vehicle (Orabase) for the application of drugs to the oral mucus membranes, Oral Pathol.; 12, 1080-1089, 1959.
36. Chen J L and Cyr G N. Compositions producing adhesion through hydration, in Adhesion in Biological Systems, Manly R S Eds, Academic Press, New York, 163-167, 1970.
37. Nagai, Machida, Mucosal Adhesive Dosage Forms, Pharm., Int.196-200:1985.
38. Devarajan, P.V. and Adani, M.H., In; Jain, N.K., Eds, Controlled and Novel Drug Delivery, CBS Publishers and Distributors; New Delhi, India:2004, 52-81.
39. Gandhi, R.B., Robinson, J.R, Oral cavity as a Site for bio adhesive Drug
Delivery, Adv. Drug Del. Rev.,13;43-74:1994.
40. N.R. Jimenez-Castellanos, H. Zia and C.T. Rhodes, Mucoadhesive drug Delivery Systems, Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm.19;143:1993.