Volume : 13, Issue : 04, April – 2026
Title:
DEVELOPMENT AND CHARACTERIZATION OF POLYMERIC MICROSPHERES FOR CONTROLLED DELIVERY OF GLIMEPIRIDE
Authors :
Kishore Bandarapalle*, M Vaishnavi
Abstract :
The purpose of the present investigation was to formulate and evaluate microencapsulated glimepiride produced by the solvent evaporation method, Method: Microspheres were prepared using Carbopol 934 polymers by solvent evaporation method an characterized for their micromeritic properties and drug loading, as well as by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), X-ray Powder diffraction (XRPD) and scanning electron microscopy. In vitro release studies were performed in phosphate buffer (pH 7.4). Result: The resulting microspheres obtained by solvent evaporation method were white and free flowing in nature. The encapsulation efficiency was also found to be dependant on nature of polymer used in the formulation. The infrared spectra confirmed the stable character of glimepiride in the drug-loaded microspheres. Scanning electron microscopy revealed that the microspheres were spherical in nature. From the in vitro drug dissolution studies it was found that the sustaining effect of microspheres depended on the polymer concentration, amount of dispersant used and the type of polymer used in the formulation.
Key words: Microencapsulated, solvent evaporation method & by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy.
Cite This Article:
Please cite this article in press Kishore Bandarapalle et al., Development And Characterization Of Polymeric Microspheres For Controlled Delivery Of Glimepiride., Indo Am. J. P. Sci, 2026; 13(04).
REFERENCES:
1. Aly AM, Ali AS. (2010). Preparation and evaluation of Glimepiride tablets containing both enhanced and sustained release dosage dispersions. Int. J.Pharm. SCi. Nano.TeCH., 2(4):714-725.
2. Aminabhavi TM, Agnihotri SA. (2005). Development of novel interpenetrating network gellan gum-poly(vinyl alcohol) hydrogel microspheres for the controlled release of carvidilol. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm., 31:491-503.
3. Arefin P, Hasan I, Shfiqul MI, Reza MS. (2016). Formulation and in vitro evaluation of eudragit RL100 loaded fexofenadine HCl microspheres. Bangladesh Pharm. J., 19(1): 58-67.
4. Duchene D, Touchard F, Peppas NA.(1988). PharmaceutiCal and medical aspects of bioadhesive systems for drug administration. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm., 14:283-318.
5. Durig T, Fassihi R. (2000). Evaluation of floating and sticking extended release delivery systems: an unconventional dissolution test. J. Control. Release., 67:37–44.
6. Ezpeleta I, Arangoa MA, IraCHe JM, Staimesse S, CHabenat C, Popineau Y, OreCCHioni AM. (1999). Preparation of ulex europaeus lecitin-gelatin nanopatiCle conjugates and their Interactions with gastrointestinal muCus. Int.
7. J. Pharm., 191: 25-32.
8. Hill WJ, Hunter WG. (1966). A Review of Response Surface Methodology: A literature survey. Technometrics, 8(4): 571-590.
9. Hosmani AH, Kasture PV. (2009). Study of formulation variables on properties of Glimepiride mucoadhesive microspheres by faCtorial design. Lat. Am. J. Pharm., 28 (2): 254-60.
10. Ikeda K, Murata K, Kobayashi M, Noda K. (1992). Enhancement of bioavailability of dopamine via nasal route in beagle dogs. CHem. Pharm. Bull., 40(8):2155-2158.
11. Ginski MJ, Polli JE. (1999). PrediCtion of dissolution–absorption relationships from dissolution: CaCo-2 system. Int. J. Pharm., 177:117–125.
12. Gohel MC and Amin AF. (1998). Formulation optimization of Cntrolled release diclofenac sodium microsphere using factorial design. J. Control. release., 51: 115-122.
13. Gonzalez AG. (1993). Optimization of pharmaceutical formulations based on response surface experimental designs. Int. J. Pharm., 97: 149-159.
14. Gonzalez-Rodriguez ML, Holgado MA, Sanchez L, RabasCo AM, Fini A. (2002). Alginate/chitosan particulate systems for sodium diclofenac release. Int. J. Pharm., 232:225-234.
15. Jelvehgari M, Montazam SH. (2012). Comparison of microencapsulation by emulsion-solvent extraction/evaportion technique using derivative Cellulose and acrylate-methacrylate copolymer as carriers. Jundishapur J. Nat. Pharm. Prod., 7(4):144-152.
16. Jelvehgari M, Milani PZ, Khonsari F. (2014). Comparative study of in vitro release and mucoacesivity of gastric-compacts Composed of multiple unit system/bilayered discs using direct Compression of metformin hydrochloride. BioImpaCts., 4(1):29–38.
17. Jimenez-Castellanos MR, Zia H, Rhodes CT. (1994). Design and testing in vitro of a bioadhesive and floating drug delivery system for oral application. Int. J. Pharm., 105:65-70.




